Skip to content
Refractive Correction

Phakic Intraocular Lens (ICL)

1. What is Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL)?

Section titled “1. What is Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL)?”

Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) is a type of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens (pIOL). It corrects refractive errors by inserting a lens between the iris and the natural lens (ciliary sulcus) while preserving the natural lens. It is an intraocular surgery performed under an operating microscope, similar to cataract surgery, but the natural lens is not removed.

The main indication is moderate to high myopia (especially ≥6 D). Since the cornea is not removed, there is no risk of corneal ectasia. It preserves accommodation and offers excellent reversibility. It is particularly useful for cases where LASIK or SMILE is not indicated (thin cornea, high myopia).

Considerations for ICL Surgery Indications (Clinical Decision Flow)

Section titled “Considerations for ICL Surgery Indications (Clinical Decision Flow)”

Determining the indication for ICL surgery requires comprehensive evaluation of multiple factors.

  1. Refractive error assessment: Spherical equivalent ≥−6 D is the main indication (Guideline 8th edition)2). −3 D to −6 D is a cautious indication.
  2. Age: Generally 21–45 years. Consider age-related changes in the natural lens (progression of presbyopia, risk of cataract).
  3. Anterior segment evaluation: Anterior chamber depth ≥2.8 mm (from corneal endothelium to anterior lens surface), angle-to-angle distance, corneal endothelial cell count ≥2,300 cells/mm² (age ≥21).
  4. Corneal shape: Keratoconus, post-LASIK ectasia, and irregular astigmatism are contraindications or require cautious consideration.
  5. Systemic conditions: Pregnancy and lactation are contraindications. Immunosuppression and connective tissue diseases require cautious consideration.
  6. Patient needs and understanding: Consent for intraocular surgery and willingness to adhere to regular postoperative follow-up.

After comprehensive evaluation, surgery is performed following detailed outpatient explanation and informed consent2).

In 1953, Strampelli developed the first anterior chamber pIOL. Early lenses had many complications such as corneal endothelial failure and glaucoma, but in 1977 Worst developed an iris-fixated type, and in 1986 Fyodorov developed a posterior chamber type, improving safety. STAAR Surgical launched the first posterior chamber pIOL in 1993 and received FDA approval in 2005. In March 2022, EVO/EVO+ ICL received FDA approval in the US, and over 2 million lenses have been used worldwide1).

“Collamer” developed by STAAR Surgical is a patented material with the following composition.

  • Polyhydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA): approximately 60%
  • Water: approximately 36%
  • Benzophenone: 3.8% (ultraviolet absorber)
  • Porcine-derived collagen: 0.2%

The collagen content provides high biocompatibility with biological tissues, excellent permeability to gases and metabolites, and extremely low inflammatory response 1). It shows low adsorption of proteins such as fibronectin, and long-term evaluation by specular microscopy and laser flare cell meter confirms no chronic inflammation.

The latest EVO ICL features a 0.36 mm diameter port (KS-AquaPORT) in the center of the optic zone. This provides the following advantages:

  • Eliminates the need for Nd:YAG laser iridotomy required in previous models
  • Maintains physiological aqueous humor circulation from the posterior chamber to the anterior chamber
  • Reduces the incidence of anterior subcapsular cataract and pupillary block
  • Reduces the risk of postoperative intraocular pressure elevation

The EVO+ model has a larger effective optic zone (up to 7.5 mm), which is expected to reduce glare, halos, and higher-order aberrations in younger patients with larger pupil diameters. In an FDA clinical trial (200 eyes with moderate myopia), 99.7% of eyes maintained appropriate vault, and there were zero cases of angle closure, pigment dispersion, or anterior subcapsular cataract 1).

Q How is ICL different from LASIK and SMILE?
A

LASIK and SMILE correct refraction by ablating corneal stroma. ICL preserves the cornea and inserts a lens inside the eye. ICL is reversible (removable) and carries no risk of dry eye or corneal ectasia. For high myopia (6 D or more), ICL is considered superior in visual quality (contrast sensitivity, higher-order aberrations) 1).

According to the Refractive Surgery Guidelines (8th edition), the indications for phakic intraocular lens surgery are defined as follows2).

ItemCriteria
AgeGenerally 21–45 years (presbyopic age requires caution)
Correction amountMainly myopia of 6 D or more
Moderate myopia (3 D to less than 6 D)Cautious indication
High myopia (over 15 D)Cautious indication
Anterior chamber depth≥2.8 mm (≥3.0 mm from corneal endothelium)
Toric ICL indicated astigmatism1.0D to 4.0D

Based on US FDA approval (EVO ICL), indications are ages 21–45, spectacle refraction −3.0D to −20.0D, and anterior chamber depth ≥3.0mm 1).

Examination itemPurpose
Uncorrected and corrected visual acuityBaseline assessment
Subjective and objective refraction (including under dilation)Power determination
Corneal topographyExclusion of keratoconus
Corneal endothelial cell countConfirmation of ≥2300 cells/mm² (age ≥21)
Anterior segment OCT/UBMMeasurement of anterior chamber depth and angle-to-angle distance
Fundus examination (under dilation)Confirmation of retinal tear and lattice degeneration
Intraocular pressure measurementExclusion of glaucoma
Pupil diameter measurementPrediction of night vision symptoms

Measurement of anterior chamber depth and angle-to-angle distance using anterior segment OCT or ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) is essential and important for determining lens size 2).

According to the guidelines (8th edition), the following are absolute contraindications 2).

  • Active external or intraocular inflammation (including uveitis and scleritis)
  • Cataract (including lens opacity and subluxation)
  • Progressive keratoconus
  • Shallow anterior chamber and corneal endothelial damage (endothelial cell density below age-specific minimum)
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Severe diabetes or severe atopic disease (systemic diseases affecting wound healing)

Precautions include glaucoma, normal-tension glaucoma, systemic connective tissue disease, dry eye, and suspected non-progressive mild keratoconus 2).

Q Please tell me the indications and contraindications for ICL.
A

Main indications are myopia of 6D or more, age 21–45, and sufficient anterior chamber depth. Contraindications include progressive keratoconus, active ocular inflammation, cataract, pregnancy, breastfeeding, shallow anterior chamber, and corneal endothelial disorders. Moderate myopia of 3D to less than 6D and high myopia over 15D are considered cautious indications 2).

Anterior chamber angle-supported type

Representative example: AcrySof (Alcon)

Design with haptics placed in the anterior chamber angle. Chronic decrease in corneal endothelial cells, pupil ovalization, and nuclear cataract were problematic, and it has now been withdrawn from the market. Not recommended for refractive correction in young patients.

Anterior chamber iris-fixated type

Representative examples: Artisan/Verisyse (Ophtec/Abbott), foldable versions Artiflex/Veriflex

Fixed to the mid-peripheral iris with claws. Chronic decrease in corneal endothelial cells is a concern, but it is safer than the angle-supported type. Requires a large incision, and attention to postoperative astigmatism is necessary 9).

Posterior chamber type (ICL)

Representative example: Visian ICL (STAAR Surgical)

Placed in the ciliary sulcus. It is away from the corneal endothelium, so the risk of endothelial cell loss is low. In EVO/EVO+, the central hole reduces the risk of pupillary block and anterior subcapsular cataract. Can be inserted through a 3.0 mm small incision.

The ESCRS guidelines recommend preoperative evaluation for cataract surgery after anterior chamber pIOL implantation, including checking for iris damage, patency of peripheral iridotomy, and corneal endothelial cell density and morphology 9).

4. Diagnosis and prescription (lens size determination)

Section titled “4. Diagnosis and prescription (lens size determination)”

Accurate determination of lens size directly affects postoperative outcomes. ICL sizes include 13.2 mm, 13.7 mm, 14.0 mm, and 14.5 mm, and proper size selection is key to vault management.

Comparison of size determination methods:

MethodMeasurementCharacteristics
WTW + ACD methodHorizontal corneal diameter + anterior chamber depthSimple but moderate accuracy
Anterior segment OCT STS methodSulcus-to-sulcus distanceDirect measurement, higher accuracy
UBM STS methodSulcus diameter by ultrasound biomicroscopyUsed when anterior segment OCT is unsuitable

Direct measurement of the sulcus-to-sulcus (STS) diameter using anterior segment OCT or UBM provides better vault prediction accuracy than WTW and is recommended as a standard preoperative evaluation 4).

The ideal vault (the gap between the ICL and the anterior lens surface) is 250 to 750 μm 2).

Vault statusRisk
Less than 250 μm (low vault)Contact with the lens → anterior subcapsular cataract
250–750 μm (appropriate)Best safety margin
Over 750 μm (high vault)Pushes the iris forward → angle narrowing, pigment dispersion, pupil block
Anterior segment OCT after ICL surgery (vault measurement)
Anterior segment OCT after ICL surgery (vault measurement)
Igarashi A, Kumegawa K, Kamiya K. Comparison of Vault Measurements Using a Swept-Source OCT-Based Optical Biometer and Anterior Segment OCT. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9:865719. Figure 1. PMCID: PMC9259877. License: CC BY.
Horizontal cross-sectional image by anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) showing the distance from the corneal endothelium to the anterior ICL surface (C-ICL), the vault from the posterior ICL surface to the anterior lens surface, and the anterior chamber depth (ACD). This corresponds to the postoperative evaluation of vault values (250–750 μm) discussed in the section “4. Diagnosis and Prescription (Lens Size Determination).”

For anterior chamber IOLs, the Van der Heijde nomogram is used to calculate the power from refractive value, corneal refractive power, and anterior chamber depth 9). Postoperative vault tends to decrease over years (due to age-related lens swelling), making regular anterior segment OCT evaluation important 4).

Q What is vault and why is it important?
A

Vault is the distance between the ICL and the anterior lens surface, measurable with anterior segment OCT. The appropriate range is 250–750 μm. If less than 250 μm, contact with the lens may cause anterior subcapsular cataract. If more than 750 μm, the ICL pushes the iris forward, narrowing the angle and increasing the risk of elevated intraocular pressure and pigment dispersion 2).

5. Standard Treatment (Surgical Technique)

Section titled “5. Standard Treatment (Surgical Technique)”

Peripheral iridotomy is not required for EVO/EVO+ ICL. When using conventional Visian ICL, YAG laser iridotomy was performed at two superior sites 2–3 weeks before surgery 1).

Since transient intraocular pressure elevation may occur postoperatively, observation for at least 2 hours after surgery is recommended on the day of surgery 2).

  1. Performed under topical anesthesia (with intracameral lidocaine)
  2. Dilate with 1% tropicamide and 2.5% phenylephrine
  3. Create a 3.0–3.2 mm temporal corneal incision
  4. Inject cohesive viscoelastic (HPMC 2%) into the anterior chamber
  5. Inject and unfold the ICL in front of the iris plane
  6. Place the footplates of the haptics into the ciliary sulcus under the iris
  7. Remove all viscoelastic (residual is the main cause of postoperative IOP elevation)
  8. Inject miotic agent and confirm wound closure

Bilateral simultaneous surgery is possible, but in cases with high infection risk, it is preferable to perform surgery on one eye at a time2).

The following shows the 6-month results from the US FDA clinical trial for the moderate myopia group (200 eyes)1).

ParameterEVO ICLSMILETopo-LASIK
UDVA 20/20 or better94.5%84.2%88.9%
Within ±0.50 D91.5%93.7%93.0%
CDVA maintenance rate98.0%
Safety index1.21

EVO ICL has shown efficacy and safety equal to or greater than corneal refractive surgery1).

Intraocular Pressure Elevation

OVD retention: Most common. Transient elevation in 18% at 1–6 hours postoperatively 1). Resolves spontaneously within a few days.

Steroid response: Occurs in 0.5%. Managed by steroid tapering 1).

Pigment dispersion / angle narrowing: Anterior iris displacement due to excessive vault. May require ICL size change or exchange 1).

Infection / Inflammation

TASS (Toxic Anterior Segment Syndrome): Incidence 0.24%. Delayed onset around 1 week postoperatively. Treated with oral prednisolone 0.5 mg/kg and 1% eye drops every hour for 4–5 weeks 6).

Endophthalmitis: Incidence 0.017–0.036%. Intravitreal injection of vancomycin 1 mg + ceftazidime 2 mg may allow ICL preservation 7).

Others

Hyphema: Occurs due to rupture of iris ciliary body cyst. May heal with conservative treatment (tobramycin/dexamethasone eye drops + atropine gel) 8).

Anterior subcapsular cataract: Occurs when the lens contacts the ICL due to low vault. Incidence 0% in FDA trials for EVO ICL 1).

Retinal detachment: Be aware of preoperative predisposition in high myopia. Preoperative dilated fundus examination to check for retinal tears and lattice degeneration 2).

Postoperative monitoring items based on guidelines (8th edition): Check visual acuity, refraction, vault, corneal endothelial cell density, intraocular pressure, and fundus at postoperative day 1, week 1, month 1, month 3, month 6, then every 6–12 months lifelong 2). If vault is less than 250 μm, consider ICL size change or exchange; if over 750 μm, evaluate with gonioscopy.

Differential Diagnosis and Management of Intraocular Pressure Elevation

Section titled “Differential Diagnosis and Management of Intraocular Pressure Elevation”

There are multiple possible causes for early postoperative intraocular pressure elevation3).

In a case reported by Moshirfar et al. (2024), the postoperative IOP elevation was presumed to be due to residual ophthalmic viscosurgical device and early steroid response3). After 6 weeks of observation and steroid tapering, it normalized without requiring lens removal or iridotomy.

The mean corneal endothelial cell loss rate at 6 months was 2.2%1). Long-term studies show stabilization after early postoperative remodeling, with a loss rate of 3.6±7.9% reported at 8 years1). Anterior chamber phakic IOLs carry a higher risk of chronic endothelial cell loss than posterior chamber IOLs, making long-term monitoring important9).

Li et al. (2023) reported two cases of delayed-onset TASS occurring one week after ICL surgery6). Keratic precipitates (KP) and fibrin formation in the anterior chamber were observed, but treatment with oral prednisolone 0.5 mg/kg plus 1% eye drops every hour for 4–5 weeks improved both visual acuity and anterior chamber findings. The incidence rate was 0.24% (2 out of 827 eyes).

Zhang et al. (case report of hyphema) reported a 23-year-old female who developed anterior and posterior chamber hemorrhage due to rupture of an iridociliary cyst after ICL surgery8). Conservative treatment with 0.3% tobramycin/0.1% dexamethasone eye drops (4 times daily) and 1% atropine sulfate ophthalmic gel (twice daily) was continued for 17 days, and healing was achieved without ICL removal.

Zheng et al. (2023) reported a case of Staphylococcus epidermidis endophthalmitis occurring 20 days after ICL surgery7). Intravitreal injections (vancomycin 1 mg + ceftazidime 2 mg) were administered twice, and uncorrected visual acuity recovered to 22/20 without ICL removal or vitrectomy. The incidence of endophthalmitis after ICL surgery is estimated to be approximately 0.017–0.036%.

Q What should I do if my eye pressure rises after surgery?
A

The most common cause is residual ophthalmic viscosurgical device, which resolves spontaneously within a few days. Management includes tapering steroid eye drops or adding IOP-lowering medications. If due to pupillary block or lens size mismatch, iridotomy or lens exchange may be necessary3).

7. Pathophysiology and Detailed Mechanisms

Section titled “7. Pathophysiology and Detailed Mechanisms”

Collamer has extremely high biocompatibility. Examinations using specular microscopy and laser flare cell meter have confirmed the absence of inflammatory reactions 1). Due to its collagen content, it has high affinity with biological tissues and excellent permeability to gases and metabolic products. Its low surface energy and low adsorption of proteins such as fibronectin are considered reasons for maintaining a long-term low inflammatory state.

The optic zone of the ICL is positioned in an arch-like manner above the lens. Proper maintenance of the vault between the ICL and the lens allows aqueous humor to flow over the lens surface, maintaining nutrient supply to the lens and preventing cataract formation.

The central hole (KS-AquaPORT) of the EVO ICL enables physiological aqueous humor flow from the posterior chamber to the anterior chamber. This provides the following effects:

  • Prevention of pupillary block (the reason why YAG laser iridotomy, which was necessary in conventional types, is no longer needed)
  • Maintenance of metabolic product and nutrient supply to the lens
  • Reduction of the risk of anterior subcapsular cataract

Excessive vault (>750 μm) pushes the iris forward, causing pigment dispersion glaucoma due to contact with the ciliary body. Subsequently, the angle may narrow, potentially progressing to angle-closure glaucoma 3). Insufficient vault (<250 μm) leads to accumulation of metabolic products under the anterior lens capsule, forming anterior subcapsular cataract. In FDA trials, 99.7% of eyes achieved satisfactory vault, with zero cases of angle closure, pigment dispersion, or anterior subcapsular cataract 1).

Mechanism of Corneal Endothelial Cell Damage

Section titled “Mechanism of Corneal Endothelial Cell Damage”

In anterior chamber pIOLs, the lens proximity to the corneal endothelium causes micro-movements that exert mechanical stress on endothelial cells. Chronic cell damage leads to a progressive decrease in endothelial cell density over time, potentially resulting in corneal endothelial failure (bullous keratopathy). Posterior chamber ICLs are farther from the corneal endothelium, significantly reducing this risk 9). Long-term data from Kohnen et al. report that the annual endothelial cell loss rate for anterior chamber pIOLs is 2 to 3 times higher than for posterior chamber ICLs 9).

Optical Principles of Refractive Correction

Section titled “Optical Principles of Refractive Correction”

pIOLs adjust the focal point on the retina by placing an additional refractive lens inside the eye. In myopia, a concave (minus) lens delays light convergence, moving the focal point from in front of the retina onto the retina. Unlike glasses, because the lens is positioned near the eye’s principal point, there is almost no image magnification or minification, providing physiological vision. Maintaining good contrast sensitivity is also a characteristic of ICLs.

In an 8-year follow-up by Igarashi et al., the spherical equivalent remained stable (only a change from -10.3 D to +0.09 D), and the decrease rate of corneal endothelial cell density was 3.6 ± 7.9%, indicating that posterior chamber ICL has excellent long-term stability 5). A 5-year follow-up also confirmed maintained efficacy and safety 10). Alfonso et al.’s 5-year follow-up (including Toric ICL) also found no progressive increase in refractive error 10).

7b. Comparison of ICL with Other Refractive Surgeries

Section titled “7b. Comparison of ICL with Other Refractive Surgeries”

LASIK corrects refraction by ablating corneal stroma, causing irreversible changes in corneal structure postoperatively. ICL preserves the cornea and has advantages in the following aspects:

  • Reversibility: ICL can be removed. When cataracts develop, the ICL can be explanted and standard cataract surgery can be performed.
  • Dry eye: LASIK cuts corneal nerves, leading to frequent dry eye (30-40% at 6 months postoperatively). ICL preserves the cornea, resulting in a lower incidence.
  • Risk of corneal ectasia: LASIK alters corneal biomechanics, and if the residual stromal bed is thin, there is a risk of corneal ectasia. ICL has no such risk.
  • IOL calculation for future cataract surgery: LASIK changes corneal curvature, making IOL power calculation prone to errors. ICL does not affect IOL calculation.
  • Correction of high myopia: LASIK is limited to about 10 D. ICL can correct up to 20 D.

In evidence-based guidelines by Wang Y et al., it is shown that ICL (ICL) has superior characteristics to LASIK in preserving corneal biomechanics 12).

SMILE (small incision lenticule extraction) has no corneal flap, so there are no flap-related complications. However, compared to ICL, there are the following differences:

Comparison itemICL (EVO ICL)SMILE
ReversibilityYesNo
Myopia range3 to 20 DUp to 10 D
Dry eyeLow riskLower than LASIK but can occur
Corneal biomechanicsFully preservedPreserved compared to LASIK
UDVA 20/20 achievement94.5% (FDA study) 1)Approximately 84–90%

8. Latest Research and Future Prospects (Investigational Reports)

Section titled “8. Latest Research and Future Prospects (Investigational Reports)”

This is an extended depth of focus (EDOF) ICL that received CE mark approval in July 2020. It provides near and intermediate vision correction through an aspheric optical system and is indicated for both phakic and pseudophakic eyes (after monofocal IOL implantation). The target age is 21 to 60 years, and it is awaiting FDA approval in the United States.

Previously, the main indication was high myopia of 6D or more, but with improved safety of EVO ICL, indications are expanding to moderate to low myopia. In FDA clinical trials, about one-third of subjects had moderate myopia less than 6D, and safety and efficacy were consistent across the full range of myopia 1).

The advent of swept-source anterior segment OCT has enabled precise measurement of angle-to-angle distance and ciliary sulcus diameter. This has improved the prediction accuracy of postoperative vault and contributes to reducing the risk of cataract and angle closure. In a study by Igarashi et al., vault measurements from swept-source OCT-based optical biometry and anterior segment OCT showed good correlation, but due to systematic differences, it is recommended to use the same device for postoperative monitoring 4).

Management of High Myopia in Myopia Control

Section titled “Management of High Myopia in Myopia Control”

The global spread of myopia is a serious public health issue, with projections that by 2050, 4.9 billion people worldwide will be myopic and 940 million will have high myopia 11). High myopia (≥ -6D) increases the risk of ocular complications such as retinal tears, glaucoma, and macular degeneration. ICL has accumulated long-term safety and efficacy evidence as a standard surgical correction for high myopia of 6D or more.

A meta-analysis by Packer (2016) confirmed that central hole design ICL significantly reduces the risk of anterior subcapsular cataract, angle closure, and pupillary block compared to non-central hole designs 13).

Sun et al. (2023) reported a technique to reduce vault by rotating the ICL 90° in cases of excessive postoperative vault (high vault) 14). The mean vault improved from 1,249 μm to 459 μm, and angle and intraocular pressure normalized. This non-invasive management method avoids ICL exchange. The ESCRS guidelines recommend evaluation of iris damage, patency of peripheral iridotomy, and corneal endothelial cells in cataract surgery after anterior chamber pIOL implantation 15).

Q Can presbyopia also be corrected?
A

An ICL for presbyopia correction called EVO Viva has been developed and has received CE mark approval in Europe. It is designed to improve near and intermediate vision using an EDOF optical system, but is awaiting FDA approval in the United States. Currently, it is not a standard treatment.

Expansion of ICL Indications and Management of Low Myopia

Section titled “Expansion of ICL Indications and Management of Low Myopia”

Traditionally, ICL was mainly indicated for high myopia of 6D or more, but with improved safety of EVO ICL, indications are expanding to moderate to low myopia. In FDA clinical trials, about one-third of subjects had moderate myopia less than 6D, and safety and efficacy were consistent across the full range of myopia 1). The Refractive Surgery Guidelines (8th edition) consider 3D to less than 6D as cautious indication 2), and the indication is determined by comprehensively considering the degree of myopia, corneal shape, and patient needs.

For low myopia (less than 6D), LASIK or SMILE are common options, but ICL can be an option for patients with thin corneas, difficulty wearing contact lenses, or dry eye. The reversibility of ICL is also advantageous in that it can address future postoperative refractive changes (e.g., myopia progression, effects of presbyopia).

Postoperative QOL and Patient Satisfaction

Section titled “Postoperative QOL and Patient Satisfaction”

In the EVO ICL FDA clinical trial, 97.6% of patients were satisfied with the surgery, and good results were shown in contrast sensitivity, higher-order aberrations, and night vision function in terms of visual quality 1). Freedom from glasses and contact lenses, and the ability to engage in sports and water activities contribute to high satisfaction. However, early postoperative glare and halos (especially light rings in dark conditions) can be problematic for some patients, so preoperative measurement of scotopic pupil diameter and thorough explanation are important.


  1. Packer M. The EVO ICL for moderate myopia: results from the US FDA clinical trial. Clin Ophthalmol. 2022;16:3981-3991.
  2. 日本眼科学会屈折矯正委員会. 屈折矯正手術のガイドライン(第8版). 日眼会誌. 2024;128(2):135-138.
  3. Moshirfar M, Moin KA, Pandya S, et al. Severe intraocular pressure rise after implantable collamer lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2024;50:985-989.
  4. Igarashi A, Kumegawa K, Kamiya K. Comparison of vault measurements using a swept-source OCT-based optical biometer and anterior segment OCT. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9:865719.
  5. Igarashi A, Shimizu K, Kamiya K. Eight-year follow-up of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation for moderate to high myopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;157:532-539.e1.
  6. Li L, Zhou Q. Late-onset toxic anterior segment syndrome after ICL implantation: two case reports. BMC Ophthalmol. 2023;23:61.
  7. Zheng K, Zheng X, Gan D, Zhou X. Successful antibiotic management of Staphylococcus epidermidis endophthalmitis after implantable collamer lens implantation. BMC Ophthalmol. 2023;23:410.
  8. Zhang W, Li F, Zhou J. Anterior segment hemorrhage after implantable collamer lens surgery. Ophthalmology. (Pictures & Perspectives). 2023.
  9. Kohnen T, Kook D, Morral M, Güell JL. Phakic intraocular lenses: part 2 — results and complications. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:2168-2194.
  10. Alfonso JF, Baamonde B, Fernández-Vega L, et al. Posterior chamber collagen copolymer phakic intraocular lenses to correct myopia: five-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37:873-880.
  11. Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, et al. Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(5):1036-1042.
  12. Wang Y, Xie L, Yao K, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for keratorefractive lenticule extraction surgery. Ophthalmology. 2024.
  13. Packer M. Meta-analysis and review: effectiveness, safety, and central port design of the intraocular collamer lens. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:1059-1077.
  14. Sun Y, Li X, Sun H, et al. The long-term observation of the rotation of implantable collamer lens as the management of high postoperative vault. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023;10:1104047.
  15. European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS). ESCRS Clinical Guidelines for Cataract Surgery. Brussels: ESCRS; 2024.

Copy the article text and paste it into your preferred AI assistant.