Skip to content
Other Eye Conditions

Corneal and conjunctival vital staining examination (fluorescein, rose bengal, etc.) (Ocular Surface Vital Staining)

1. What is corneal and conjunctival vital staining?

Section titled “1. What is corneal and conjunctival vital staining?”

Corneal and conjunctival vital staining (ocular surface vital staining) is a basic ophthalmic test that visualizes damage to the corneal and conjunctival epithelium on the eye surface with dyes and quantifies the distribution and severity of the damage.

The main dyes used are the following three.

  • Fluorescein (fluorescein): A fluorescent dye that emits green fluorescence when excited by blue light. It is the most widely used
  • Rose bengal (rose bengal): A dye that stains dead cells, degenerated cells, and mucus red
  • Lissamine green (lissamine green): A substitute dye with staining properties similar to rose bengal but less irritation

The main purposes of this test are as follows:

  • To detect and quantify corneal and conjunctival epithelial damage in dry eye
  • To assess the extent of corneal infiltration and ulcers in infectious keratitis2)
  • To evaluate epithelial damage caused by drug toxicity, contact lens–related injury, eyelid abnormalities, and similar conditions
  • To support the diagnosis of Sjögren syndrome (van Bijsterveld scoring)3)

In the 2016 Dry Eye Clinical Practice Guideline, evaluation combining tear film breakup time (BUT) measurement and fluorescein staining is recommended as a core part of dry eye diagnosis1). In the 2006 edition, corneal and conjunctival epithelial damage was essential for diagnosing dry eye, but in the 2016 edition, epithelial damage was no longer a required criterion, and diagnosis shifted to short BUT and symptoms. Even so, vital staining remains an important way to objectively record the degree and pattern of epithelial damage1).

In the initial evaluation of infectious keratitis, fluorescein staining is also a standard procedure used to understand the extent and shape of corneal epithelial defects, and it is incorporated into care based on the Infectious Keratitis Clinical Practice Guideline (3rd edition)2).

Q What can a vital staining test show?
A

The distribution and severity of corneal and conjunctival epithelial damage are visualized. With fluorescein, punctate superficial keratopathy (SPK) and erosions or ulcers of the corneal epithelium appear as fluorescence, and with rose bengal or lissamine green, dead and degenerated cells are stained. The pattern of SPK distribution can help suggest the underlying condition (dry eye, drug toxicity, contact lens-related injury, and so on). Scoring methods can also be used to quantify the damage and track treatment effects over time.

2. Characteristics and procedure of each dye

Section titled “2. Characteristics and procedure of each dye”
Corneal epithelial lesions in both eyes on fluorescein staining (slit-lamp finding)
Corneal epithelial lesions in both eyes on fluorescein staining (slit-lamp finding)
Tagmouti A, Lazaar H, Benchekroun M, Boutaj T, Benchekroun S, Amazouzi A, et al. Association Between Thygeson Superficial Punctate Keratitis and Celiac Disease. Cureus. 2025;17(3):e80252. doi:10.7759/cureus.80252. PMID:40196095; PMCID:PMC11975144. Figure 2. PMID: 40196095; PMCID: PMC11975144; DOI: 10.7759/cureus.80252. License: CC BY.
With slit-lamp fluorescein staining, corneal epithelial lesions in the right eye (A) and left eye (B) are shown as green fluorescence under blue light. This corresponds to the fluorescein staining observation method covered in the section on characteristics and procedure of each dye.

Fluorescein is the most widely used vital dye. It is commonly used because it is easy to obtain, safe, and causes little irritation. Fluorescein is a dye that emits green fluorescence (521 nm) when excited by blue light (maximum absorption wavelength 494 nm). It can be observed with only a cobalt blue filter, but lesions are shown more clearly when a blue-free filter is added to the observation system.

Staining principle and key observation points:

  • Penetrates and stains areas where tight junctions between epithelial cells are disrupted
  • The clearest observation is possible with a combination of a cobalt blue filter (excitation 494 nm) and a blue-free filter (barrier filter)
  • Main staining targets: punctate superficial keratopathy (SPK), corneal erosion, corneal ulcer

Minimal staining procedure:

  1. Place 1–2 drops of saline on the fluorescein test strip and shake well to remove excess moisture
  2. Lightly touch the wet end of the strip to the tear meniscus along the lower eyelid margin to stain
  3. Take care not to let the test strip touch the eyeball directly (to prevent false negatives caused by over-staining)
  4. Observe the distribution, density, and shape of SPK under a cobalt blue filter

Rose bengal stains the ocular surface by a mechanism different from fluorescein.

Staining characteristics:

  • Stains dead cells, degenerating cells, and areas where mucin protection has been lost red
  • The surface of normal cells is covered with secreted mucin, which prevents rose bengal from penetrating
  • Observe under white light or with a red filter
  • It is more irritating than fluorescein and may cause pain when instilled

van Bijsterveld scoring (used for both rose bengal and lissamine green):

  • Each of the three regions—the cornea, nasal bulbar conjunctiva, and temporal bulbar conjunctiva—is scored from 0 to 3
  • A total score of 3.5 or higher is positive (used in the diagnostic criteria for Sjögren syndrome)3)

Lissamine green is an alternative dye with staining properties similar to rose bengal, but it is less irritating to patients.

Staining characteristics:

  • Stains dead and degenerated cells green (same mechanism as rose bengal)
  • Can be clearly observed with a red filter (560 nm or higher)
  • Causes less irritation on instillation than rose bengal, making it easier on patients
  • In recent years, clinical use has been increasing as an alternative to rose bengal

Fluorescein (fluorescein)

Absorption wavelength: 494 nm (blue light) → fluorescence 521 nm (green)

Staining target: areas where tight junctions between epithelial cells are disrupted (intercellular spaces)

Main uses: SPK detection, BUT measurement, corneal ulcer/erosion evaluation

Irritation: low (easiest to use)

Observation filter: cobalt blue + blue-blocking (barrier) filter

Rose bengal

Staining color: red

Stained targets: dead cells, degenerated cells, areas lacking mucin protection

Main use: diagnosis of Sjögren syndrome (van Bijsterveld score), dry eye evaluation

Irritation: strong (pain when instilled)

Observation filter: white light or red filter

Lissamine green

Staining color: green

Stained targets: dead cells, degenerated cells (same mechanism as rose bengal)

Main use: alternative to rose bengal. Dry eye and Sjögren syndrome evaluation

Irritation: low (less burden for patients than rose bengal)

Observation filter: clearly seen with a red filter (560 nm or above)

CharacteristicFluoresceinRose bengalLissamine green
Staining colorGreen fluorescenceRedGreen
Staining targetIntercellular spaces (areas where tight junctions are disrupted)Dead cells, degenerated cells, and mucin-deficient areasDead cells and degenerated cells
IrritationLowHigh (with pain)Low
Observation filterCobalt blue + blue-freeWhite light · red filterRed filter (560 nm or higher)
Main usesSPK · BUT measurement · corneal ulcerSjögren diagnosis · dry eyeRose bengal alternative
Representative scoreOxford score / NEI scorevan Bijsterveld scorevan Bijsterveld score
Q What is the difference between rose bengal and lissamine green?
A

Both stain dead and degenerated cells, but lissamine green is less irritating and easier on patients. Rose bengal can cause pain when instilled, so in some cases topical anesthesia may be needed. Lissamine green has become more widely used in recent years as an alternative dye that solves these drawbacks. For observation, using a red filter (560 nm or higher) makes the stained areas easier to see clearly.

Example of a corneal five-part grid and fluorescein staining evaluation using the NEI scoring method
Example of a corneal five-part grid and fluorescein staining evaluation using the NEI scoring method
Kim S, Park D, Shin Y, et al. Deep learning-based fully automated grading system for dry eye disease severity. PLoS One. 2024;19(3):e0299776. Figure 1. PMID: 38483911; PMCID: PMC10939279; DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299776. License: CC BY 4.0.
An evaluation grid that divides the cornea into five regions—central, superonasal, superotemporal, inferonasal, and inferotemporal—based on the NEI score, along with an example evaluation using actual fluorescein staining photographs. This corresponds to the NEI/Industry Workshop score covered in the section ‘Scoring methods and criteria’ of the main text.

Several scoring systems have been established to quantify corneoconjunctival epithelial damage.

Scoring methodEvaluation areaScore rangeTotalMain use
van Bijsterveld scorecornea, nasal bulbar conjunctiva, temporal bulbar conjunctiva (3 areas)0–3 points each9-point maximum (abnormal at 3.5 points or higher)Sjögren syndrome diagnostic criteria
Oxford scoringcornea, bulbar conjunctiva (nasal and temporal) (3 areas)0–4 points each (5 levels)15-point maximumdry eye severity assessment
NEI/Industry Workshop scorecornea (5 sections)0–3 points each15-point maximumdry eye clinical research

Evaluate each of the three areas—cornea, nasal bulbar conjunctiva, and temporal bulbar conjunctiva—on a 0 to 3 scale (0: no staining, 1: a few punctate stains, 2: staining tending to merge, 3: widespread staining). A total score of 3.5 or higher is considered abnormal and is internationally adopted as a diagnostic criterion for Sjögren syndrome3).

Each of the three areas—cornea and bulbar conjunctiva (nasal and temporal)—is scored from 0 to 4 in five grades, for a total of 15 points. Each grade is assessed semiquantitatively by comparing it with panel diagrams. It is used to assess dry eye severity and treatment response.

The cornea is divided into five zones—central, superonasal, superotemporal, inferonasal, and inferotemporal—and each zone is scored from 0 to 3, for a total of 15 points. It is widely used in clinical research and multicenter trials.

Staining criteria for corneal and conjunctival epithelial damage in the Dry Eye Clinical Practice Guidelines (2006 edition)1):

  • fluorescein staining score of 3 or higher
  • or rose bengal staining score of 3 or higher
  • or lissamine green staining score of 3 or higher

In the 2016 dry eye diagnostic criteria, epithelial damage was removed from the essential diagnostic requirements, but observing epithelial damage continues to play an important role in assessing dry eye severity and treatment response1).

4. Clinical significance and how to read staining patterns

Section titled “4. Clinical significance and how to read staining patterns”

Assessment of punctate superficial keratopathy (SPK)

Section titled “Assessment of punctate superficial keratopathy (SPK)”

Punctate superficial keratopathy (superficial punctate keratopathy: SPK) is the most common eye finding in patients who complain of a foreign body sensation. SPK is a “result” of corneal epithelial damage caused by some underlying factor, not a diagnosis of the cause. Fluorescein vital staining is essential for detecting SPK and understanding its distribution pattern, and it can reveal subtle SPK that cannot be seen with slit-lamp microscopy alone.

When SPK is detected, it is important to actively infer the underlying cause from its distribution pattern.

SPK distribution patterns and underlying causes

Section titled “SPK distribution patterns and underlying causes”
Distribution patternMain underlying cause
Concentrated in the lower one-third of the corneaDry eye (aqueous-deficient type), entropion
Concentrated in the upper one-third of the corneaSuperior limbic keratoconjunctivitis (SLK), trachoma
Entire cornea (diffuse)Drug-induced toxic keratopathy, viral keratitis
3 to 9 o’clock direction (horizontal band)Contact lens (3-9 o’clock staining)
Central corneaLagophthalmos, neuroparalytic keratitis

Exogenous SPK:

Endogenous SPK:

  • Eyelid abnormalities (abnormal blinking, eyelid shape abnormalities)
  • Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD)
  • Aqueous-deficient dry eye
  • Neuroparalytic keratopathy

Characteristic staining pattern of drug-induced toxic keratopathy

Section titled “Characteristic staining pattern of drug-induced toxic keratopathy”

In drug-induced toxic keratopathy, damage to the conjunctival epithelium is less pronounced than damage to the corneal epithelium. This finding can be clearly confirmed with fluorescein staining and is useful for distinguishing it from other causative diseases. If diffuse SPK is seen across the entire cornea, the effect of the eyedrops being used (preservatives, high-concentration medications, aminoglycoside antibiotics, etc.) should be considered2).

The significance of staining in infectious keratitis

Section titled “The significance of staining in infectious keratitis”

In infectious keratitis, fluorescein staining allows objective assessment of the shape, area, and depth (judged by the intensity of staining) of corneal epithelial defects. The extent and shape of the ulcer are used as indicators for choosing treatment and for follow-up observation2). In addition, antibacterial eyedrops (high-concentration formulations and aminoglycosides) are likely to cause corneal epithelial toxicity, so it is important to check with vital staining during treatment for any worsening of epithelial damage2).

Q What can staining patterns tell us?
A

By observing the distribution pattern of SPK, the underlying disease can be inferred. SPK concentrated in the lower cornea suggests dry eye or entropion, upper SPK suggests SLK or trachoma, and diffuse SPK throughout the cornea suggests drug toxicity or viral keratitis. SPK at the 3 to 9 o’clock position is typical of contact lens injury, and SPK in the central cornea is characteristic of lagophthalmos and neuroparalytic keratitis. SPK is only the “result” of epithelial damage, and using the distribution pattern as a clue to search for the cause is the key point in care.

Section titled “5. Related treatment guidelines (management by cause of epithelial damage)”

Identify the cause from the distribution and severity of epithelial damage confirmed by vital staining, and choose treatment according to the cause.

Standard treatment based on the Dry Eye Clinical Practice Guidelines (2016 edition) is as follows1).

  • 3% diquafosol sodium eye drops (Diquas®): instill 6 times a day. It has multifaceted effects, including promoting aqueous secretion, promoting secretion of secretory mucin (MUC5AC), and increasing expression of membrane-associated mucins (MUC1, MUC4, MUC16). It improves tear film stability, corneoconjunctival epithelial damage, and subjective symptoms
  • 2% rebamipide suspension eye drops (Mucosta®): instill 4 times a day. They promote secretion of secretory mucin and increase expression of membrane-associated mucin by increasing the number of goblet cells. They improve corneoconjunctival epithelial damage and subjective symptoms
  • 0.1% hyaluronic acid eye drops: improve corneoconjunctival epithelial damage and subjective symptoms. Can be used for a broad range of subtypes
  • Punctal plug insertion: suppresses tear drainage. It is the first-line choice in the area break pattern (tear-deficient type)

Epithelial damage due to infectious keratitis

Section titled “Epithelial damage due to infectious keratitis”

Based on the Infectious Keratitis Clinical Practice Guidelines (3rd edition), select the appropriate antimicrobial agent after identifying the causative organism2).

  • Initial treatment of bacterial keratitis: broad-spectrum fluoroquinolone eye drops such as levofloxacin 1.5%
  • Note that high-concentration eye drops and aminoglycosides are prone to causing corneal epithelial damage2)
  • During treatment, regularly confirm improvement in epithelial damage with vital staining
  • Stop or switch the eye drops suspected to be the cause (such as preservative-containing products)
  • Consider switching to preservative-free preparations
  • After stopping, confirm improvement in the epithelial damage with vital staining
  • Temporarily stop wearing contact lenses
  • Review the lens material, water content, and wearing time
  • If dry eye is present, use eye drop treatment at the same time

6. Measurement principles (optical principles and staining mechanisms)

Section titled “6. Measurement principles (optical principles and staining mechanisms)”

Fluorescein is a fluorescent dye that absorbs cobalt blue light (494 nm) and emits green fluorescence (521 nm). The principle of fluorescence is photoluminescence, in which absorbed energy is re-emitted as light.

A blue-blocking filter (barrier filter) blocks the excitation light (around 494 nm) and lets only the fluorescence wavelength (521 nm) pass. This removes background light and makes SPK fluorescein staining easier to see. When a blue-blocking filter is attached to the slit lamp microscope, the sensitivity for detecting SPK improves greatly compared with using the cobalt blue filter alone.

When the tight junctions of the corneal epithelium break down, fluorescein penetrates the intercellular spaces and fluoresces. Areas where normal tight junctions are intact do not allow fluorescein to enter and therefore are not stained.

Rose bengal selectively stains cells that are not protected by mucin. Healthy ocular surface cells are covered by a mucin layer (mainly secretory mucin MUC5AC), which prevents rose bengal staining. Dead and degenerated cells have lost this mucin protection, so they are stained. Unlike fluorescein, it stains the dead cells themselves, so it can be considered an indicator of ocular surface cell viability.

Lissamine green stains dead and degenerated cells by a mechanism similar to rose bengal. Staining can be seen most clearly under observation with a red filter (560 nm or higher). It is thought to be less irritating to the ocular surface than rose bengal because of differences in penetration into living tissue.

The blue filter is especially important for fluorescein observation. Even with cobalt blue light without a filter, lesions can be seen, but adding a blue filter:

  • removes background light (scattered cobalt blue light)
  • allows only fluorescent wavelengths to reach the retina, greatly improving contrast
  • makes fine SPK easier to detect
  • also improves the accuracy of BUT measurement (assessment of tear film breakup)
  • Noninvasive corneal epithelial thickness mapping with anterior segment OCT: Advances are being made in tomographic mapping of corneal epithelial thickness using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). It may make it possible to evaluate thinning and irregular distribution of the corneal epithelium without vital staining, and research is underway as a complement or alternative to vital staining4)
  • Objectifying stain scores with automated image analysis: Stain scoring (Oxford score, van Bijsterveld score, etc.) currently depends on the observer’s subjective judgment. Development of automated scoring systems using AI and machine learning is progressing, and improved reproducibility and objectivity are expected5)
  • Research to refine staining sensitivity and specificity: Studies are ongoing to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of each stain dye by dry eye subtype and disease stage. In particular, comparisons of the equivalence and interchangeability of lissamine green and rose bengal are being conducted
  • Combination with confocal microscopy: By combining in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) with vital staining, cellular-level evaluation of epithelial damage is becoming possible. Its application to identifying pathogens in infectious keratitis is also being studied4)
  1. ドライアイ研究会診療ガイドライン作成委員会(島﨑潤, 横井則彦, 渡辺仁, 他). ドライアイ診療ガイドライン. 日本眼科学会雑誌. 2019;123(5):489-592.
  2. 日本眼感染症学会感染性角膜炎診療ガイドライン第3版作成委員会. 感染性角膜炎診療ガイドライン(第3版). 日眼会誌. 2023;127(10):859-895.
  3. Vitali C, Bombardieri S, Jonsson R, Moutsopoulos HM, Alexander EL, Carsons SE, Daniels TE, Fox PC, Fox RI, Kassan SS, Pillemer SR, Talal N, Weisman MH, European Study Group on Classification Criteria for Sjögren’s Syndrome. Classification criteria for Sjögren’s syndrome: a revised version of the European criteria proposed by the American-European Consensus Group. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002;61(6):554-558. doi:10.1136/ard.61.6.554. PMID:12006334; PMCID:PMC1754137.
  4. Palakkamanil MM, Nichols KK. Comparison of lissamine green and rose bengal staining. Optom Vis Sci. 2015;92(5):566-571.
  5. Bron AJ, Evans VE, Smith JA. Grading of corneal and conjunctival staining in the context of other dry eye tests. Cornea. 2003;22(7):640-50. doi:10.1097/00003226-200310000-00008. PMID:14508260.

Copy the article text and paste it into your preferred AI assistant.