Types 1 and 2
Type 1: Posterior polar cataract with posterior subcapsular cataract (PSC). The mildest form.
Type 2: Round to oval disc-shaped opacity with an onion-like ring structure. May be accompanied by gray-white spots at the edge.
Posterior polar cataract (PPC) is a subtype of congenital cataract characterized by a well-defined, dense white discoid opacity located just beneath the posterior capsule at the posterior pole (near the center of the pupillary area, slightly nasal).
The inheritance pattern is primarily autosomal dominant, and multiple genetic loci have been identified. Sporadic cases have also been reported. The opacity often occurs at the terminal end of remnants of the hyaloid artery, presenting a wide range of severity from benign Mittendorf dot to severe cataract that impairs visual function.
The incidence is lower compared to other cataract subtypes. 65–80% of cases are bilateral; in unilateral cases, attention must be paid to the risk of amblyopia. The opacity forms in early life, but its clinical significance may increase with age.
The diameter of the opacity is reported to be 1.8–3.0 mm. The posterior capsule is often fragile and thin, making it difficult to accurately assess its condition preoperatively with slit-lamp examination.
It is mainly inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern. If one parent is affected, the probability of transmission to a child is about 50%. Sporadic cases also occur, so it can develop even without a family history.
The characteristic of posterior polar cataract is that even a small opacity significantly affects visual function because it is located at the center of the pupil.
Slit-lamp examination reveals a disc-shaped white opacity at the posterior pole beneath the posterior lens capsule. The opacity has clear borders and is classified into the following four types according to the Daljit Singh classification.
Types 1 and 2
Type 1: Posterior polar cataract with posterior subcapsular cataract (PSC). The mildest form.
Type 2: Round to oval disc-shaped opacity with an onion-like ring structure. May be accompanied by gray-white spots at the edge.
Types 3 and 4
Type 3: Disc-shaped opacity with dense white spots at the edge. Often accompanied by a fragile, thinned, or deficient posterior capsule. Used as the “Daljit Singh sign” to predict posterior capsule rupture.
Type 4: A combined type where nuclear sclerotic cataract is superimposed on types 1–3. This has the highest surgical difficulty.
Additionally, based on the temporal progression of the condition, there is also a classification into Stationary type, which shows central opacity and a target-like ring, and Progressive type, where radial opacities expand over time.
Anterior segment OCT (AS-OCT) allows morphological evaluation of the posterior capsule, and three categories of posterior capsule defect have been described: “conical,” “moth-eaten,” and “ectatic.” Irregular contours of the posterior capsule or localized anterior protrusion (conical sign) suggest an existing posterior capsule tear.
The main cause of posterior polar cataract is genetic predisposition. Genetic loci associated with global ocular diseases such as anterior segment mesenchymal dysgenesis and persistent hyperplastic primary vitreous (PHPV) have also been reported to be involved in posterior polar cataract.
Opacification often occurs at the terminal end of remnants of the hyaloid artery. This is thought to be due to scar-like changes remaining at the posterior pole of the lens when the hyaloid artery regresses near the posterior capsule during the embryonic period.
Environmental risk factors have not been clearly identified at present. Opacification may progress with age or be complicated by nuclear sclerosis (type 4).
Diagnosis is made by comprehensively evaluating the location and shape of the opacity, whether it is bilateral, family history, age, and other factors.
| Diagnostic Item | Characteristics |
|---|---|
| Location of opacity | Subcapsular, near the center of the pupil, or nasal side |
| Shape of opacity | Disc-shaped, well-defined, dense white |
| Diameter of opacity | 1.8–3.0 mm |
| Affected eye | Bilateral (65–80%) or unilateral |
| Inheritance pattern | Autosomal dominant inheritance |
It is important to assess the condition of the posterior capsule before surgery.
It is difficult to accurately assess posterior capsule fragility with slit-lamp examination alone. If anterior segment OCT reveals irregular posterior capsule contour or localized protrusion (cone sign), it suggests a pre-existing posterior capsule tear and requires caution. Detailed informed consent before surgery is important.
Surgery is selected when there is an impact on visual function such as decreased vision, photophobia, or halos. Due to the fragility of the posterior capsule, the risk of intraoperative complications is high, and it is important to choose the appropriate surgical technique and master the procedure.
This often takes longer than standard cataract surgery. Topical anesthesia is the basis, but if the surgery time is prolonged, sub-Tenon’s or retrobulbar anesthesia may be necessary.
The most important thing is to minimize manipulation of the posterior capsule, keep the anterior chamber stable at all times, and perform surgery calmly and carefully without rushing.
Perform continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (CCC). The size should be approximately 5 mm, but adjust according to nucleus size and intraoperative needs 1). A larger continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis facilitates nucleus division and removal, and is advantageous for nucleus delivery in case of posterior capsule rupture.
Various techniques have been reported to avoid damaging the posterior capsule.
Two-Y Crushing Technique (new technique)1): For posterior polar cataracts with moderate to hard nuclear hardness, after sufficiently separating the nucleus and epinucleus by hydrodelineation, the nucleus is dislocated into the anterior chamber using two Y-shaped rotators, manually crushed into four or more pieces, and then phacoemulsified. This method requires no rotation of the nucleus and minimizes cumulative dissipated energy (CDE) (achieving low values of 1.80 for the right eye and 1.66 for the left eye)1). It provides high anterior chamber stability and reduces the risk of posterior capsule rupture.
When removing the tip, the anterior chamber pressure may drop, causing the posterior capsule to bulge forward and rupture. To prevent this, replace the anterior chamber with OVD (viscoelastic material) before withdrawing the tip.
Carefully aspirate and remove the epinucleus and cortex from the periphery. The central white opacity should be handled last with maximum caution. Posterior capsule polishing is generally not performed due to the risk of rupture.
Posterior capsule rupture is the most important intraoperative complication, with some literature reporting an incidence of up to 36% of cases. Due to improvements in surgical devices and techniques, it has decreased to around 15% after the 2000s. Other complications include nucleus drop, vitreous prolapse, high intraocular pressure, posterior capsule opacification, retinal detachment, and cystoid macular edema.
The formation of posterior polar cataract is closely related to the regression process of the hyaloid artery during the embryonic period. The hyaloid artery normally regresses completely before birth, but its terminal remnants near the posterior capsule can cause scar-like changes in the posterior pole. Therefore, minor remnants may only be observed as a Mittendorf dot, while more prominent remnants form clinical posterior polar cataract.
In posterior polar cataracts, the posterior capsule is often fragile and thinned in and around the opacity. Adhesion between the opacity and the posterior capsule may occur, but it is difficult to accurately assess the degree of adhesion preoperatively with slit-lamp examination. In some cases, spontaneous rupture of the posterior capsule occurs before surgery.
In cases with a posterior capsule defect, the following morphologies are observed on anterior segment OCT:
Genes associated with posterior polar cataract overlap with loci involved in anterior segment mesenchymal dysgenesis and PHPV. It shows high penetrance with autosomal dominant inheritance, but there is phenotypic variability even within the same family.
In posterior polar cataract, the posterior capsule is adherent to the opacity, so rotating the nucleus causes traction on the posterior capsule, directly triggering posterior capsule rupture 1). Additionally, ultrasonic energy vibrations and surge (sudden aspiration pressure fluctuations) can also act on the posterior capsule and induce rupture. This is the pathophysiological basis for the surgical strategy of “no rotation, low aspiration pressure, low flow rate.”
The novel “Two-Y Crushing Technique” reported by Ramatchandirane et al. (2024) is noteworthy for its ability to completely avoid nuclear rotation and reduce cumulative ultrasound energy in phacoemulsification for PPC 1).
In one case where this technique was performed, low cumulative ultrasound energy values of 1.80 in the right eye and 1.66 in the left eye were achieved, and best-corrected visual acuity of 6/6 (with good IOL placement) was confirmed in both eyes on postoperative day 1 1). This technique is considered safe only in cases where hydrodelineation is performed well and the boundary between the nucleus and epinucleus is clearly visible.
However, this report is a case report with only one case (both eyes), and the level of evidence is low. Further validation with a larger number of cases is needed.
Combining primary posterior capsulorrhexis is also being studied as a planned approach to manage posterior capsule rupture. Additionally, IOL fixation strategies combined with anterior vitrectomy using a vitrector after posterior capsule rupture are being investigated at multiple institutions.