Microphthalmia (microphthalmos) is a congenital ocular developmental anomaly in which the axial length is at least 2 standard deviations (SD) below the age-adjusted mean. In adults, an axial length less than 21 mm is indicative; in 1-year-olds, less than 19 mm is the threshold 5). It is a rare disease with a frequency of 1–3 per 10,000 individuals, and no curative treatment has been established. There is no sex predilection, and bilateral and unilateral cases occur with equal frequency.
Nanophthalmos: Without anatomical malformations, defined as an axial length of 20.5 mm or less. It is frequently associated with high hyperopia (>+20 D), scleral thickening, and angle-closure glaucoma.
Posterior microphthalmos: Only the posterior segment is reduced. Association with the MFRP gene has been reported1).
Colobomatous microphthalmos: Complicated by coloboma due to failure of closure of the embryonic fissure.
According to Duke-Elder’s classification, microphthalmos is classified into (1) nanophthalmos, (2) microphthalmos with coloboma, (3) microphthalmos with congenital ocular anomalies, and (4) microphthalmos with systemic diseases. According to Majima’s embryopathological classification, it is classified into seven types: optic vesicle developmental disorder, optic cup formation disorder, anterior segment mesenchymal dysgenesis, lens-induced, vitreous-induced, failure of embryonic fissure closure, and ocular wall developmental disorder.
According to Relhan et al., nanophthalmos (NO) and posterior microphthalmos (PM) are distinguished based on a corneal diameter of 11 mm. In NO, the corneal diameter is 10.06 mm, anterior chamber depth 2.68 mm, lens thickness 4.77 mm, and the complication rate of angle-closure glaucoma reaches 69%. In contrast, in PM, the corneal diameter is 11.39 mm, anterior chamber depth 3.20 mm, lens thickness 3.93 mm, and the complication rate of angle-closure glaucoma is 0%2).
The estimated birth prevalence is 0.2 to 1.7 per 10,000 people, with regional differences. The prevalence of microphthalmia is reported to be about 1/7,000, and anophthalmia about 1/30,0005). Bilateral cases are more common, and patients with bilateral involvement are more likely to have systemic diseases. There is no difference in incidence by sex or race, and it accounts for 3–12% of visually impaired children.
QWhat is the difference between microphthalmos and nanophthalmos?
A
Microphthalmos refers to cases with anatomical malformations (such as coloboma, cataract, etc.), while nanophthalmos refers to a uniformly small eye without malformations. Nanophthalmos carries a particularly high risk of high hyperopia and angle-closure glaucoma. For details, see the “Causes and Risk Factors” section.
Decreased visual acuity: Depends on the type and location of the ocular malformation. If coloboma involves the macula or optic disc, severe visual impairment occurs.
High hyperopia: Nanophthalmos presents with high hyperopia exceeding +20 D.
Cataract: A frequent complication. Surgery is often difficult due to zonular defects and poor pupillary dilation associated with microphthalmos and coloboma.
Pupillary deviation and lens dislocation: Observed as part of anterior segment structural abnormalities.
In a histological study of 4 cases by Rajendrababu et al., the sclera of nanophthalmic eyes showed irregular arrangement of collagen fibers, fraying, and overexpression of fibronectin6). In cases with axial length <17 mm, severe disruption of the scleral lamellar structure was observed, whereas in those with axial length >17 mm, the lamellar structure was preserved6).
33–50% are syndromic and may be associated with the following systemic abnormalities5). Systemic abnormalities are more often bilateral, and a Japanese survey reported central nervous system abnormalities/developmental delay in 13%, multiple malformations/syndromes in 9%, and chromosomal abnormalities in 4%.
Related syndromes include CHARGE syndrome, Lenz microphthalmia syndrome4), Fraser syndrome, Lowe syndrome, Meckel-Gruber syndrome, TORCH syndrome (congenital infection), Hallermann-Streiff syndrome, and oculodentodigital syndrome. Collaboration with pediatrics and genetics is essential.
Most cases are sporadic, but autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, and X-linked inheritance patterns have been reported. More than 100 genetic traits associated with microphthalmia and coloboma have been identified.
Major causative genes are listed below.
Inheritance Pattern
Main Causative Genes
Autosomal dominant
SOX2, OTX2, BMP4, CHD7, GDF6, RARB, SHH
Autosomal recessive
PAX6, STRA6, FOXE3, RAX, SMOC1, VSX2
X-linked
BCOR, HCCS, NAA10
Among these, SOX2 and PAX6 have been identified as major causative genes.
There is a detailed genetic classification into three groups: syndromic, nonsyndromic, and coloboma-associated. In syndromic cases, BMP4, MAB21L2, OTX2, SOX2 (autosomal dominant) and STRA6 (autosomal recessive) have been reported; in nonsyndromic cases, MFRP, PRSS56 (autosomal recessive); and in coloboma-associated cases, TENM3 (autosomal recessive) and GDF3, GDF6 (autosomal dominant) have been reported.
The following individual gene mutations have been reported.
YAP1: A transcriptional coactivator involved in the Hippo signaling pathway. A de novo mutation (c.178dupG) was identified in a 1-year-old boy as the cause of bilateral coloboma and right microphthalmia 3).
TENM3: Involved in eye development and axon guidance, highly expressed in the optic tract. A homozygous mutation (c.5069-1G>C) was reported in a 32-year-old man 5).
BCOR: The causative gene for X-linked Lenz microphthalmia syndrome. Two loci, MCOPS1 and MCOPS2, have been identified 4).
SIX6: Involved in the development of the retina, optic nerve, and hypothalamus. A homozygous mutation (c.1A>G) was reported in a case of microphthalmia with coloboma7).
MFRP: Expressed in the ciliary epithelium and retinal pigment epithelium, necessary for postnatal eye growth and emmetropization 1)2).
Infections during pregnancy (rubella, toxoplasmosis, cytomegalovirus, etc.)
Drug exposure (thalidomide, warfarin, alcohol)
Radiation exposure
Maternal vitamin A deficiency
QWhat inheritance patterns can microphthalmia follow?
A
Most cases are sporadic, but autosomal dominant (e.g., SOX2, OTX2), autosomal recessive (e.g., PAX6, STRA6), and X-linked (e.g., BCOR, HCCS) inheritance patterns have been reported. Over 100 associated genes have been identified, and the inheritance pattern varies depending on the causative gene.
B-mode ultrasound: Useful for confirming the shape of the eyeball.
CT/MRI: Suitable for analyzing orbital shape. MRI has no radiation exposure and high resolution, making it useful for confirming residual ocular tissue, optic nerve, and extraocular muscles, as well as differentiating anophthalmia from severe microphthalmia.
Fetal orbits can be detected by 11–12 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound is used to measure the length of the eyeball. If clinically suspected, genetic evaluation such as chromosomal microarray analysis via amniocentesis may be considered.
Comprehensive screening using a 78-gene MAC panel is employed7). Whole genome sequencing (WGS) is useful for identifying mutations that are difficult to detect by exome sequencing3).
Cryptophthalmos: A congenital anomaly where skin covers the ocular surface.
Cyclopia: Presence of a single eye in the midline of the face.
Synophthalmia: Fusion of the two eyes.
QCan microphthalmia be diagnosed prenatally?
A
The fetal orbits can be detected by ultrasound at 11–12 weeks of gestation, and eye size can be measured. If suspected, genetic evaluation is performed by chromosomal microarray analysis of amniotic fluid.
If retinal function is present, refractive correction and amblyopia treatment are most important. True microphthalmia presents with high hyperopia exceeding +20D, making early refractive correction essential. Microphthalmia is associated with high refractive errors, so early initiation of regular spectacle use is important to promote visual development. In bilateral mild cases, complications such as cataract and glaucoma should be diagnosed early, and surgery and amblyopia treatment should be performed. Generally, cases with corneal diameter ≤6 mm or marked asymmetry result in visual acuity less than 0.02. However, because organic amblyopia due to retinal nerve fiber layer abnormalities is also a factor, achieving normal visual acuity is often difficult. For amblyopia, occlusion therapy is performed. In cases with severe visual impairment, low vision care should be initiated from infancy.
Microphthalmic eyes are prone to serious complications in infancy to young adulthood. Frequent complications include cataract (34%), glaucoma (13%), and retinal detachment (7%). All are difficult to treat, and lifelong management of complications is necessary to preserve visual function.
Cataract surgery: Often difficult due to Zinn zonule defects and poor pupillary dilation associated with microphthalmia and coloboma of the ciliary body.
Retinal detachment: Caused by tears at the edge or inside of the coloboma. Many cases have poor prognosis.
Nanophthalmoscataract surgery: Prophylactic scleral window may be performed during cataract surgery to prevent exudative retinal detachment due to scleral thickening. IOL power can reach 36–54 D 6).
Angle-closure glaucoma: Requires observation and timely therapeutic intervention.
When eyeball atrophy or corneal opacity occurs, prosthetic eye fitting is recommended for cosmetic issues.
QWhen should orbital expansion be started?
A
In severe cases with axial length <16 mm, natural orbital growth is unlikely, so initiation within the first few weeks of life is recommended. For axial length ≥16 mm, timing can be adjusted according to social and aesthetic needs. Since fitting becomes difficult after age 3, early initiation is desirable.
Microphthalmia results from improper development of the optic vesicle, anterior neural tube, or orbit during early embryogenesis. Incomplete closure of the embryonic fissure leads to coloboma. Reduced size of the optic cup, changes in vitreous proteoglycans, low intraocular pressure, abnormal growth factor production, and insufficient secondary vitreous production are also contributing factors.
Pathophysiology of Nanophthalmos (True Microphthalmia)
In nanophthalmos, abnormalities in scleral collagen and decreased chondroitin sulfate have been reported. This leads to scleral thickening, causing vortex vein outflow obstruction, and choroidal fluid accumulation leading to exudative retinal detachment.
Histologically, irregular arrangement and fraying of scleral collagen fibers, and overexpression of fibronectin have been confirmed 6). In cases with axial length <17 mm, severe disruption of the scleral lamellar structure is observed, while in those with axial length >17 mm, the lamellar structure is preserved 6).
YAP1/Hippo signaling pathway: YAP1 is a transcriptional coactivator that binds to TEAD to promote growth. Haploinsufficiency (loss-of-function single-allele mutation) causes microphthalmia and coloboma3). It is characterized by incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity.
TENM3: A transmembrane protein involved in eye development and axon guidance, abundantly expressed in the optic tract 5).
MFRP: Expressed in the ciliary epithelium and retinal pigment epithelium. It plays an essential role in postnatal eye growth and emmetropization; loss-of-function mutations cause posterior microphthalmos pigmentary retinopathy syndrome (PMPRS) 1)2).
SIX6: A homeobox gene that regulates the development of the retina, optic nerve, and hypothalamus 7).
BCOR: The causative gene for X-linked Lenz microphthalmia syndrome, located at the MCOPS1 locus 4).
7. Latest Research and Future Perspectives (Investigational Reports)
DeYoung et al. (2022) identified a de novo YAP1 mutation (c.178dupG) by whole-genome sequencing (WGS) in a 1-year-old boy with bilateral coloboma and right microphthalmia 3). This mutation was difficult to detect by exome analysis, demonstrating the utility of WGS. The same mutation was not found in the parents, confirming de novo occurrence.
Gholami Yarahmadi et al. (2022) reported a homozygous splice site mutation (c.5069-1G>C) in TENM3 in an Iranian male 5). Known mutations in TENM3 include 7 mutations across 6 families; this case adds a new mutation. Many reports come from consanguineous families, supporting autosomal recessive inheritance.
First report of combined microphthalmia and coloboma due to SIX6 mutation
Javidi et al. (2022) identified a homozygous SIX6 mutation (c.1A>G) using a 78-gene MAC panel in a 3-week-old male from a consanguineous family 7). Corneal diameter was 8.0×8.5/8.5×8.5 mm, and axial length on MRI was 19/17.5 mm. This is the first case of combined microphthalmia and coloboma due to SIX6 mutation.
Histological evaluation of nanophthalmos sclera by light microscopy
Rajendrababu et al. (2022) performed cataract surgery with prophylactic scleral fenestration in 4 nanophthalmos cases (mean axial length 17.60±1.40 mm) and evaluated the excised scleral tissue by light microscopy 6). Immunohistochemistry confirmed overexpression of fibronectin, indicating that diagnosis is possible without the use of expensive electron microscopy. IOL power ranged from 36 to 54 D.
Phenotypic diversity of PMPRS (posterior microphthalmos-pigmentary retinopathy syndrome)
Adeel et al. (2023) reported a case of MFRP gene-related PMPRS (47-year-old female, axial length 18.37/18.00 mm, +10 D) 1). WTW 12.0/12.4 mm, extinguished electroretinogram, foveoschisis, and sclerochoroidal thickening were observed, demonstrating the phenotypic diversity of MFRP mutations.
Adeel SS, KA SM, Sharma A, Shah VJ, Shetty A. Posterior Microphthalmos Pigmentary Retinopathy Syndrome. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2023;18(2):240-244.
Garg P, Kumar B, Dubey S. A unique case of bilateral nanophthalmos and pigmentary retinal abnormality with unilateral angle closure glaucoma and optic disc pit. BMC Ophthalmol. 2023;23:391.
DeYoung C, Guan B, Ullah E, Blain D, Hufnagel RB, Brooks BP. De novo frameshift mutation in YAP1 associated with bilateral uveal coloboma and microphthalmia. Ophthalmic Genet. 2022;43(4):513-517.
Monticelli M, De Marco R, Garbossa D. Lenz microphthalmia syndrome in neurosurgical practice: a case report and review of the literature. Childs Nerv Syst. 2021;37:2713-2718.
Gholami Yarahmadi S, Sarlaki F, Morovvati S. Novel mutation in TENM3 gene in an Iranian patient with colobomatous microphthalmia. Clin Case Rep. 2022;10:e05532.
Rajendrababu S, Shroff S, More S, et al. A report on a series of nanophthalmos with histopathology and immunohistochemistry analyses using light microscopy. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022;70:2597-2602.
Javidi E, Javidi S, Campeau PM, Ospina LH. A Case of Bilateral Microphthalmia and Extensive Colobomas of the Globes Associated with a Likely Pathogenic Homozygous SIX6 Variant. Case Rep Ophthalmol. 2022;13:804-808.
Copy the article text and paste it into your preferred AI assistant.
Article copied to clipboard
Open an AI assistant below and paste the copied text into the chat box.