Skip to content
Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus

Peripapillary Hyperreflective Ovoid Mass-like Structures (PHOMS)

1. What is Peripapillary Hyperreflective Ovoid Mass-Like Structures (PHOMS)

Section titled “1. What is Peripapillary Hyperreflective Ovoid Mass-Like Structures (PHOMS)”

PHOMS (Peripapillary Hyperreflective Ovoid Mass-Like Structures) are structures observed around the optic disc using Enhanced Depth Imaging OCT (EDI-OCT). They are defined as ovoid, hyperreflective mass-like structures located on Bruch’s membrane1, 2, 4).

The name directly reflects their characteristics.

  • P: peripapillary
  • H: hyperreflective
  • O: ovoid
  • MS: mass-like structure 2)

First described on OCT in 2011, it was initially mistaken for buried optic disc drusen (ODD) 1, 2).

In 2018, Malmqvist et al. of the ODD Consortium analyzed 38 EDI-OCT images and defined PHOMS as a distinct entity from ODD 1, 4).

In 2020, Petzold et al. refined the diagnostic criteria using the Delphi method 2, 4). The current diagnostic criteria are as follows:

  • Strictly peripapillary and located above Bruch’s membrane
  • Elevates two or more retinal layers upward
  • Shows reflectivity similar to RNFL (retinal nerve fiber layer)/GCL (ganglion cell layer)

The prevalence of PHOMS varies greatly depending on the study population.

  • Beijing Eye Study (adults): Prevalence 1.6%. Strongest association with small optic disc
  • Danish pediatric cohort: 8.9%1, 4)
  • Myopic children (6–12 years, ≥1.00D): 26%
  • Healthy adults: 0%–18.9%4)
  • Pediatric pseudopapilledema: 53.6%–98.4% attributed to PHOMS2)

PHOMS coexists in 47%–90% of ODD patients1, 4). The current understanding is that PHOMS and ODD coexist but are distinct structures.

Q How are PHOMS and ODD different?
A

PHOMS are peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid structures located above Bruch’s membrane, appearing as homogeneous hyperreflective areas around the optic disc on OCT. ODD (optic disc drusen) are located within the optic disc and have a hyporeflective core with a hyperreflective rim. The two often coexist (47–90% of ODD patients have concurrent PHOMS). For differentiation points using different tests, see also the “Diagnosis and Testing Methods” section.

PHOMS itself is usually asymptomatic1, 2). In the Beijing Eye Study, adults with PHOMS showed no visual function decline.

Rarely, PHOMS-related spontaneous optic disc hemorrhage may occur, and it is sometimes discovered with chief complaints of floaters or asthenopia5).

Q Does PHOMS cause decreased vision?
A

PHOMS itself usually does not cause vision loss. In the Beijing Eye Study, no visual function decline was confirmed in adults with PHOMS. However, underlying diseases associated with PHOMS (such as IIH, optic neuritis, NAION) may cause vision loss.

It presents with blurring of the optic disc margin and a prominent C-shaped or O-shaped halo on the nasal side2, 4).

EDI-OCT is the gold standard for diagnosing PHOMS 1). The main findings are as follows.

Morphology and Distribution

Shape: C-shaped halo/annular. Present as a continuous structure.

Predilection sites: Nasal and superior regions.

Characteristic appearance: “Ski-slope” or “boot-shaped” appearance.

Size: Mean height 399 μm, mean width 721 μm.

Reflectivity Characteristics

Reflectivity: Uniformly high reflectivity. Similar to RNFL reflectivity.

Internal hyperreflective spots: Present in 93.8% of children.

Location: Strictly located on Bruch’s membrane.

  • Infrared reflectance (IR): Ring sign1, 4)
  • OCTA: Internal coronal vascular complex. Large PHOMS (≥500 μm) show decreased vascular density4, 5, 6)
  • Autofluorescence: Usually hypoautofluorescent. 47% have hyperautofluorescent spots1, 4)
  • B-mode ultrasound: Hyperechoic without posterior shadowing (minimum 56 dB)1)

PHOMS is a marker of axoplasmic flow stasis. When axonal transport is impaired, nerve fibers bulge laterally and herniate, becoming visible as PHOMS 1, 2, 4).

PHOMS is a non-specific finding that accompanies various optic nerve diseases. The main associated diseases and their complication rates are shown below.

  • Small optic disc: Strongest associated factor
  • Myopia: Prevalence increases with higher refractive error
  • Optic disc tilt: Associated with TDS2, 4)
Q Is there a relationship between myopia and PHOMS in children?
A

Yes, there is a relationship. PHOMS is found in 26% of myopic children (aged 6–12 years, ≥1.00D), making myopia an important risk factor. The higher the degree of myopia, the more likely optic disc tilt occurs, and Bruch’s membrane protrusion and nerve fiber bending make PHOMS formation more likely2, 4).

EDI-OCT is the gold standard for diagnosing PHOMS1). Since it is difficult to distinguish from true papilledema using ophthalmoscopy alone, evaluation with EDI-OCT is essential.

PHOMS vs ODD: Differentiation by Multimodal Imaging

Section titled “PHOMS vs ODD: Differentiation by Multimodal Imaging”

PHOMS and ODD often coexist but show different features on each modality.

ModalityPHOMSODD
Fundus examinationC-shaped/O-shaped peripapillary haloCrystalline-like structure within the optic disc
OCTUniform hyperreflective, oval, peripapillaryHyporeflective core + hyperreflective rim, intra-papillary
OCTAMicrovascular network insideNo vascular network
AutofluorescenceUsually hypoautofluorescentHyperautofluorescent
UltrasoundHigh echogenicity at retinal level, no shadowingDeep high echogenicity with posterior shadowing

PHOMS is a major cause of pseudopapilledema, but it can also coexist with true papilledema. The following points are important for differentiation.

  • OCT: Check for the presence of nerve fiber layer edema within the optic disc
  • Clinical information: Presence of symptoms suggestive of IIH such as headache and diplopia
  • Follow-up: True papilledema improves with treatment of the underlying disease

Even if PHOMS is present, it is essential to rule out urgent conditions such as IIH1, 2, 4).

There is no specific treatment for PHOMS itself1, 2, 4). The principle of treatment is management of the underlying disease, and PHOMS resolves with treatment of the underlying condition.

Resolution of PHOMS with Treatment of Underlying Disease

Section titled “Resolution of PHOMS with Treatment of Underlying Disease”
Underlying diseaseTime of resolutionTreatment
Optic neuritis75% resolve within 1 month, remaining within 3–8 monthsStandard optic neuritis treatment
IIHResolves with weight loss and acetazolamideWeight management and oral medication
NAIONResolves in 1–2 monthsObservation
LHONResolves within 12 monthsManage underlying disease

Aziria et al. (2023) reported a prevalence of PHOMS of 7.0% in a study of 102 cases of optic neuritis 3). After treatment of optic neuritis, PHOMS disappeared within 1 month in 75% of cases, and within 3 to 8 months in the remaining cases.

Regular monitoring with OCT is useful for assessing disease activity and treatment response of the underlying condition 2). Tracking changes in PHOMS allows non-invasive evaluation of papilledema recurrence or changes in disease activity.

Q Does PHOMS require treatment?
A

Specific treatment for PHOMS itself is not necessary. PHOMS resolves with appropriate treatment of the underlying condition (e.g., idiopathic intracranial hypertension, optic neuritis, non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy). However, some underlying causes of PHOMS, such as idiopathic intracranial hypertension, require early treatment, so diagnosis and treatment of the causative disease are the highest priority.

6. Pathophysiology and Detailed Mechanisms

Section titled “6. Pathophysiology and Detailed Mechanisms”

Histopathological findings of PHOMS show S-shaped herniation of swollen and vacuolated axons 2, 4). Positive S100 immunostaining indicates that these structures are of axonal origin 4). Experiments using radioisotopes and electron microscopy have also detected markers of axonal transport stasis 2, 4).

The formation mechanism of PHOMS varies depending on the underlying disease.

ODD

Mechanical compression: Mechanical compression within the optic disc due to calcified deposits (drusen) impairs axonal transport.

Location: The ODD within the optic disc protrudes laterally as PHOMS.

Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension

Pressure gradient reversal: Reversal of the pressure gradient across the lamina cribrosa impairs axonal transport.

Reversibility: PHOMS regress when intracranial pressure normalizes after treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Tilted Disc Syndrome / Myopia

Structural deformation: Protrusion of Bruch’s membrane and bending of nerve fibers mechanically obstruct axonal flow.

Prevalence: PHOMS is observed in 39.5% of children with TDS.

Optic Neuritis

Inflammatory disorder: Disruption of axonal transport due to demyelination and inflammatory cell infiltration.

Course: PHOMS resolves as inflammation subsides.

Borrelli et al. (2021) first reported the presence of a coronal vascular complex within PHOMS using OCTA 6). It was also shown that larger PHOMS (≥500 μm) are associated with lower vascular density. This space-occupying effect is speculated to be the mechanism underlying the reduced vascular density.

Relationship between PHOMS and ODD: Precursor Stage Hypothesis

Section titled “Relationship between PHOMS and ODD: Precursor Stage Hypothesis”

It has been proposed that PHOMS may be a precursor stage of ODD. There is a calcium deposition hypothesis suggesting that accumulation of axon-derived substances eventually leads to calcium deposition and transition to ODD (optic disc drusen)1). However, this hypothesis is not yet established at present.


7. Latest Research and Future Perspectives (Research Stage Reports)

Section titled “7. Latest Research and Future Perspectives (Research Stage Reports)”

Borrelli et al. (2021) suggested that PHOMS may contain a vascular complex rather than being merely a morphological structure 6). This finding, first visualized by OCTA (optical coherence tomography angiography), has significantly advanced the understanding of PHOMS pathophysiology. Further research is needed on the relationship between PHOMS and optic nerve blood flow.

Spontaneous Papillary Hemorrhage within PHOMS

Section titled “Spontaneous Papillary Hemorrhage within PHOMS”

Wang et al. (2024) reported two cases of spontaneous localized papillary hemorrhage within PHOMS 5). Both were detected with asymptomatic or mild symptoms (floaters, eye strain), and OCTA was useful in identifying the bleeding source from the vascular complex. The mechanism and clinical significance of hemorrhage within PHOMS are currently being elucidated.

MS Longitudinal Studies and Potential as a Biomarker

Section titled “MS Longitudinal Studies and Potential as a Biomarker”

The prevalence of PHOMS in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients is reported to be 16%–19.7%, and longitudinal studies are investigating the potential of PHOMS as a noninvasive biomarker for relapse activity and axonal damage 2, 4).

Research on Progression Indicators of Myopia

Section titled “Research on Progression Indicators of Myopia”

PHOMS is observed in 26% of myopic children and is expected to be used as a biomarker for optic disc morphological changes associated with axial elongation, with potential application in monitoring myopia progression2, 4).

Application to Noninvasive Monitoring of IIH

Section titled “Application to Noninvasive Monitoring of IIH”

Efforts are underway to utilize PHOMS for monitoring intracranial pressure in IIH. Prospective studies are needed to determine whether changes in PHOMS can serve as an indicator reflecting fluctuations in intracranial pressure2).


  1. Heath Jeffery RC, Chen FK. Peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures: Multimodal imaging—A review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023;51(1):67-80.
  2. Li B, Li H, Huang Q, Zheng Y. Peripapillary hyper-reflective ovoid mass-like structures (PHOMS): clinical significance, associations, and prognostic implications in ophthalmic conditions. Front Neurol. 2023;14:1170409.
  3. Aziria A, Philibert M, Deschamps R, Vignal C, Hage R. Are PHOMS a clinical sign of optic neuritis? Eye. 2023;37(13):2776-2780.
  4. Xiao D, Lhamo T, Meng Y, Xu Y, Chen C. Peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures: multimodal imaging and associated diseases. Front Neurol. 2024;15:1364613.
  5. Wang F. Spontaneous Focal Hemorrhage of Optic Disc in Peripapillary Hyperreflective Ovoid Mass-Like Structures. Int Med Case Rep J. 2024;17:843-847.
  6. Borrelli E, Barboni P, Battista M, et al. Peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures (PHOMS): OCTA may reveal new findings. Eye. 2021;35(2):528-531.

Copy the article text and paste it into your preferred AI assistant.