IOL dislocation
IOL decentration: The haptic is visible in the pupillary area under mydriasis.
Iridodonesis: A sign of zonular laxity.
Vitreous prolapse: May be accompanied by vitreous herniation into the anterior chamber.
Secondary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation is a general term for additional IOL transplantation performed for aphakia occurring during or after initial cataract surgery, or for problems with an existing IOL.
In open globe injury (OGI), primary IOL implantation increases the risk of endophthalmitis, so secondary implantation is recommended 1).
IOL exchange refers to the procedure of removing the existing IOL and inserting a new one. Secondary IOL implantation is a broader concept that includes new implantation in aphakic eyes without an existing IOL. This article covers both.
IOL dislocation
IOL decentration: The haptic is visible in the pupillary area under mydriasis.
Iridodonesis: A sign of zonular laxity.
Vitreous prolapse: May be accompanied by vitreous herniation into the anterior chamber.
IOL opacification
Calcification: Common in hydrophilic acrylic IOLs. Occurs after contact with intraocular gas or air.
Posterior capsule opacification: Visual loss due to posterior capsule opacification (can be treated with Nd:YAG laser).
Deposits on IOL surface: Changes due to inflammation or infection.
Preoperative evaluation for secondary IOL implantation requires more detailed anterior segment assessment than routine cataract surgery.
Secondary IOL implantation after trauma is performed after confirming resolution of infection risk and inflammation. After open globe injury, a waiting period of at least several months may be recommended 1). For secondary implantation after intraoperative complications during cataract surgery, the optimal timing may be within 2–6 weeks postoperatively, before closure of the anterior capsule. In a survey of 481 ophthalmologists in India, 2–6 weeks was the most common response 3).
The choice of surgical procedure is based on the following stepwise evaluation.
This is indicated when the edge of the continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis is intact circumferentially. A three-piece acrylic IOL is used for sulcus fixation (one-piece acrylic IOL sulcus fixation should be avoided as it often leads to IOL dislocation, elevated intraocular pressure, and glaucoma).
Optic capture combined with sulcus fixation improves IOL stability and centration, and reduces myopic shift. The best method is to place the haptics in the ciliary sulcus and capture the optic through the continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis.
In ciliary sulcus fixation, the IOL is positioned more anteriorly than in-the-bag fixation, so the IOL power must be appropriately reduced to avoid myopic shift.
This is one option for eyes without capsular support. It can be fixed to the anterior surface (anterior chamber side) or posterior surface (retropupillary fixation) of the iris.
Advantages of retropupillary iris-claw fixation:
Requirements for implantation:
Complications of iris-claw IOL: Corneal endothelial cell loss (approximately 10.9% at 3 years postoperatively), increased intraocular pressure (0–7%), pupil ovalization (up to 13.9%), IOL dislocation (0–10%)
| Comparison item | Retroiridal fixation | Scleral-fixated IOL |
|---|---|---|
| Surgical time | Short | Long |
| Visual acuity (BCVA) | No significant difference | No significant difference |
| Specific complications | Iris atrophy, pigment dispersion, pupil distortion | Suture exposure, IOL tilt |
It is selected in patients with insufficient capsular or iris support, or in those with shallow anterior chamber or corneal endothelial failure.
The Yamane method is currently a rapidly popularizing technique for secondary IOL insertion in eyes without capsular support. Its effectiveness has been reported in various situations, including aphakia after open globe injury1).
In a case of aphakia secondary to open-globe injury, the Yamane technique achieved improvement to uncorrected visual acuity of 20/50 at 15 months postoperatively (with diabetic macular edema as a limiting factor for residual vision) 1).
There is no definitive study showing which is superior. Vitreoretinal surgeons tend to prefer sutureless scleral-fixated IOLs (57%), while anterior segment surgeons tend to prefer sutured IOLs (60%). Among sutureless techniques, vitreoretinal surgeons favor the Yamane method (40%), and anterior segment surgeons favor glued IOLs (49%) 3).
Progressive zonular laxity due to pseudoexfoliation syndrome, trauma, high myopia, or connective tissue disease is the most common cause. In suture-fixated IOLs, gradual hydrolysis and oxidative degradation of polypropylene sutures (especially 10-0) lead to suture breakage. Breakage rates of 12–28% have been reported for 10-0 polypropylene within 50–80 months, and a switch to 9-0 is recommended.
In aphakic eyes with a completely intact lens capsule, Soemmering’s ring and proliferating lens epithelial cells help maintain the space between the anterior and posterior capsules. By incising this space with an MVR knife, removing residual cortex, and then inserting the IOL into the capsular bag, fixation in a physiological position becomes possible.
The Carlevale IOL (FIL SSF) is a new sutureless scleral-fixated IOL design with T-shaped haptics that pass through scleral incisions. Cases using the EDOF (extended depth of focus) version (FIL SSF EVOLVE) in aphakic eyes have been reported, achieving UDVA 20/23 (distance) and UNVA 20/40 (30 cm near) at 3 months postoperatively 2). The combination of EDOF optics and scleral fixation design may offer spectacle independence for patients without capsular support, but long-term outcomes are still being accumulated.
The “Saloon Door Technique” has been reported, in which an IOL is fixated behind an existing artificial iris (AI) without removing it. The AI is radially incised at the 12 and 6 o’clock positions, a 3-piece IOL is passed through this “door-like opening” into the posterior chamber, and then scleral-fixated using the Yamane technique 4). This avoids AI removal and refixation, reducing surgical invasiveness, but it involves off-label use (incision) of the AI, and long-term safety assessment of AI structure is needed.