Step 1
Oral prednisolone: The most common initial dose is 1 mg/kg/day (76.9%). The maximum dose is usually used for 4 weeks or less. 97.7% of specialists use it in combination with immunomodulatory drugs at the start.
Rituximab is a human-mouse chimeric monoclonal antibody that binds to the CD20 surface antigen on CD20-positive B cells and depletes B cells via antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC). It was originally developed as a treatment for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma and rheumatoid arthritis.
In the field of non-infectious uveitis, it is used for refractory cases that are resistant to standard immunosuppressive therapy or TNF-α inhibitors. In a survey by the International Ocular Inflammation Society (IOIS) of 221 specialists from 53 countries, rituximab ranked third in frequency of use among 14 biologics 1). Following adalimumab (98.6%) and infliximab (79.6%), 62.9% of specialists had clinical experience with it 1).
However, only 0.9% of specialists use rituximab as a first-line biologic, which is low compared to adalimumab (97.7%) and infliximab (1.4%) 1). It is usually positioned as second- or third-line therapy when other biologics are ineffective.
It is used for refractory non-infectious uveitis when TNF-α inhibitors such as adalimumab are ineffective or contraindicated. It is rarely chosen as a first-line biologic (0.9%) and is positioned as later-line therapy 1).
In non-infectious uveitis that is the target of rituximab treatment, the following symptoms are the main complaints.
Clinical findings relevant to the indication for rituximab vary depending on the underlying disease. Non-infectious uveitis includes various autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases.
Approximately 70% of patients with non-infectious uveitis develop visual impairment, and about 20% progress to legal blindness within an average of 3 years 1).
Non-infectious uveitis treated with rituximab is due to autoimmune or autoinflammatory mechanisms. The main factors indicating the initiation of systemic immunomodulatory therapy are as follows 1).
Before starting systemic immunomodulatory therapy, comprehensive testing is necessary. According to the IOIS survey, all specialists (221, 100%) performed pre-treatment testing 1).
The main pre-treatment test items and their implementation rates are shown below 1).
| Test Item | Implementation Rate |
|---|---|
| Blood biochemistry tests | 98.2% |
| Complete blood count | 93.7% |
| QuantiFERON test | 88.7% |
In addition, chest X-ray (83.3%), hepatitis B and C virus serological tests (72.4%), and HIV serological tests (57.5%) are also performed 1).
Patients under treatment are usually evaluated every 6 to 12 weeks. For inactive uveitis, 72.9% of specialists evaluate every 6 to 12 weeks, and 74.7% screen for drug toxicity at the same interval 1).
Treatment for non-infectious uveitis is carried out in a stepwise manner. According to the IOIS survey, the typical treatment steps are as follows 1).
Step 1
Oral prednisolone: The most common initial dose is 1 mg/kg/day (76.9%). The maximum dose is usually used for 4 weeks or less. 97.7% of specialists use it in combination with immunomodulatory drugs at the start.
Step 2
Conventional immunomodulatory drugs: Methotrexate is the first choice (57.0%), followed by mycophenolate mofetil (19.9%) and azathioprine (14.9%).
Step 3
Biologic agents: Adalimumab is the first choice (97.7%). In non-responders, switching to infliximab or rituximab is considered.
Rituximab is positioned later in the step-ladder approach that includes conventional drugs and biologics. However, 60.2% of specialists have used biologics before conventional drugs due to specific uveitis diagnoses (91.0%) or contraindications to conventional drugs (71.4%) 1).
The use of rituximab varies depending on the type of disease 1).
It takes 3 to 6 months to assess drug efficacy, and 81.9% of specialists switch to another drug after a 3- to 6-month trial period if ineffective1).
Combination of systemic immunomodulatory drugs was used by 85.1% of specialists1). The most common combination is methotrexate plus adalimumab (84.0%), but rituximab is also used in combination with methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil. Combining these immunosuppressants may suppress the appearance of anti-drug antibodies and help maintain treatment efficacy2).
The required inactive period before drug discontinuation is 2 years for 64.3% of specialists1).
It is used as a subsequent treatment for refractory cases where TNF-α inhibitors such as adalimumab or infliximab are ineffective. An international survey found that 62.9% of specialists have experience using it 1). However, it is not a first-line treatment, so consultation with a specialist is essential.
Rituximab binds to the CD20 antigen. CD20 is expressed on pre-B cells and mature B cells but not on stem cells or plasma cells. After binding, it eliminates B cells through the following mechanisms:
B cells are precursors for antibody production and also participate in antigen presentation and cytokine production. In non-infectious uveitis, there are cases where B cells contribute to the maintenance of inflammation, and in such cases, B-cell depletion with rituximab can be effective.
In recent years, rituximab has gained attention for preventing gene therapy-associated uveitis that occurs after intravitreal injection of AAV (adeno-associated virus) vectors used in gene therapy 2).
Intravitreal AAV vector administration induces the production of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs), making re-administration to the same eye or administration to the contralateral eye difficult. It has been suggested that concomitant use of rituximab at the time of initial administration, temporarily depleting the B cell population, may suppress the rise in NAbs 2). However, in experimental models, anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) appeared after B cell recovery and limited the expression of the therapeutic transgene 2).
Strategies combining corticosteroids or other immunomodulatory drugs with rituximab to reduce ADAs and improve NAb suppression are being investigated 2).
In retinal gene therapy using AAV vectors, neutralizing antibodies are produced after administration, posing a barrier to treatment of the contralateral eye. B-cell depletion with rituximab is being studied as a means to suppress this humoral immune response 2). However, it is not yet an established treatment.
Retinal gene therapy using AAV vectors is rapidly advancing, but immune reactions after intravitreal injection remain a major challenge. Immunomodulatory strategies including rituximab are being explored as follows2).
Anti-TNF-α therapy is already established as a standard second-line treatment for severe refractory uveitis, but it shares the common challenge of anti-drug antibodies limiting efficacy, similar to rituximab2). Concomitant use of mycophenolate mofetil or methotrexate may reduce anti-drug antibodies for both biologics2).
Treatment outcomes for pediatric non-infectious uveitis have improved with the introduction of biologics3).
Cann et al. (2018) analyzed 166 children with non-infectious uveitis, reporting that 72.9% received methotrexate, and 58 of them progressed to biologics3). The incidence of visual loss (>0.3 LogMAR) was 0.05 per eye-year, and severe visual loss (≥1.0 LogMAR) was 0.01 per eye-year, showing improvement compared to previous reports.
In children, the incidence of cataract was highest (0.05 per eye-year), with glaucoma more common in juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis and macular edema more common in idiopathic uveitis3). Further investigation is needed regarding the role of rituximab in pediatric uveitis.