Tectal Pupil (Parinaud Syndrome)
Lesion: Dorsal midbrain (pretectal area, posterior commissure)
Pupil size: Moderate dilation (bilateral)
Laterality: Bilateral
Associated findings: vertical gaze palsy, convergence-retraction nystagmus, Collier sign
Parinaud syndrome, also called dorsal midbrain syndrome, is a syndrome caused by a lesion in the dorsal midbrain. The main findings are tectal pupil (light-near dissociation) and vertical gaze palsy (especially upward saccadic impairment).
Light-near dissociation (Parinaud pupil) is a pupillary abnormality caused by lesions in the dorsal midbrain that disrupt the pupillary light reflex pathway through the pretectal area and posterior commissure. Pineal tumors are a well-known cause, but they account for only a minority of cases.
The components of this syndrome consist of the following six items.
In a 25-year review of 40 adult cases, vertical gaze palsy was present in all cases, but the classic triad including convergence-retraction nystagmus and light-near dissociation was found in only 65%, indicating that not all components are necessarily present1.
When obstruction of the cerebral aqueduct occurs, it is complicated by papilledema and is called sylvian aqueduct syndrome.
They essentially refer to the same syndrome, but are sometimes strictly distinguished. Sylvian aqueduct syndrome refers to the condition where, in addition to the findings of Parinaud syndrome, there is increased intracranial pressure and papilledema due to obstruction of the cerebral aqueduct. The presence or absence of papilledema is the main distinguishing point.
The main subjective symptoms reported by patients are as follows.
When attempting upward gaze, the lateral rectus muscles contract simultaneously, causing both eyes to retract into the orbit and exhibit rapid nystagmoid movements. This is thought to result from abnormal activation of the convergence system during attempted upward gaze. It is a characteristic finding of Parinaud syndrome, and observation with a slit lamp or video nystagmography is useful for diagnosis.
The causes of Parinaud syndrome are diverse. Any lesion that compresses or directly damages the posterior commissure, pretectal area, or dorsal midbrain can be a cause.
In adult studies, midbrain lesions (hemorrhage 30%, infarction 20%, tumor 15%) are the most common, and pineal region tumors account for about 30% 1. In children, pineal region tumors are the leading cause 3. Imaging diagnosis is essential for identifying the cause.
Clinical diagnosis is possible based on the combination of the following findings.
The syndrome may present with only some components, and should be suspected even when the typical six findings are not all present.
It is important to differentiate diseases that present with light-near dissociation.
Tectal Pupil (Parinaud Syndrome)
Lesion: Dorsal midbrain (pretectal area, posterior commissure)
Pupil size: Moderate dilation (bilateral)
Laterality: Bilateral
Associated findings: vertical gaze palsy, convergence-retraction nystagmus, Collier sign
Argyll Robertson pupil
Lesion: midbrain pretectal area (neurosyphilis)
Pupil size: bilateral severe miosis
Laterality: bilateral
Associated findings: miosis, irregular pupil, history of syphilis infection
Adie pupil (tonic pupil)
Lesion: Ciliary ganglion (peripheral)
Pupil size: Moderate dilation
Laterality: Usually unilateral (about 80%)
Associated findings: Tonic miosis and areflexia (Holmes-Adie syndrome)
Light-near dissociation without miosis is called pseudo Argyll Robertson pupil and presents similarly to tectal pupil. In neurosyphilis, miosis is always present, which helps in differentiation.
The biggest difference is pupil diameter. Argyll Robertson pupils are characterized by bilateral small pupils that show extreme miosis even in dark conditions, and are strongly associated with neurosyphilis. Tectal pupils (Parinaud syndrome) present with moderate mydriasis, and accompanying findings such as vertical gaze palsy, convergence-retraction nystagmus, and Collier sign also serve as clues for differentiation.
The basic treatment strategy for Parinaud syndrome is treatment of the underlying disease. Ophthalmic treatment for the syndrome itself is symptomatic, and removing the cause leads to fundamental improvement.
Pineal tumor
Hydrocephalus
Brainstem vascular disorder
Demyelinating lesions (multiple sclerosis, etc.)
For vertical diplopia, prescription of prism glasses may be considered as a temporary symptomatic treatment. It can be useful for maintaining quality of life until the underlying disease responds to treatment. In adult studies, conservative management with observation, occlusion, and prisms was sufficient in about 88% of cases, and strabismus surgery for refractory diplopia improved symptoms in 80% of cases1.
There is no curative ophthalmic treatment. The goal is to improve symptoms by treating the underlying disease. If vertical diplopia interferes with daily life, prism glasses may be chosen as symptomatic therapy. Ophthalmology handles diagnosis, follow-up, and symptomatic treatment, while causal treatment is performed in collaboration with each specialist.
Each component finding of Parinaud syndrome is explained by neuroanatomical damage to the dorsal midbrain, centered on the posterior commissure and pretectal area.
The pretectal area is located rostral and dorsal to the cerebral aqueduct, and the posterior commissure is a white matter commissure continuing caudally. Pineal tumors or dilation of the posterior third ventricle due to hydrocephalus compresses and damages this area, causing Parinaud syndrome.
The afferent pathway of the light reflex follows the route: optic nerve → optic chiasm → optic tract → pretectal area → posterior commissure → contralateral Edinger-Westphal nucleus → oculomotor nerve → ciliary ganglion → pupillary sphincter.
In contrast, the supranuclear fibers that control the near response (convergence miosis) run more ventrally (anteriorly) than the light reflex pathway. Therefore, when the pretectal area or posterior commissure is affected, the light reflex pathway is interrupted, but the near response pathway is preserved. This is the anatomical basis for light-near dissociation 2.
| Finding | Neuroanatomical mechanism |
|---|---|
| Upward gaze palsy | Posterior commissure lesion → interruption of pathway to riMLF (rostral interstitial nucleus of medial longitudinal fasciculus) |
| Convergence-retraction nystagmus | Abnormal firing of the convergence system (lateral rectus) during attempted upward gaze |
| Collier sign | Disinhibition of the levator palpebrae due to posterior commissure lesion |
| Skew deviation | Asymmetric impairment of the vestibulo-ocular reflex pathway |
| Loss of light reflex | Blockade of the afferent pathway of the light reflex at the pretectal area and posterior commissure |
Prognosis varies greatly depending on the underlying disease.
The usefulness of endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) as an alternative to V-P shunt for Parinaud syndrome associated with hydrocephalus is attracting attention. ETV is advantageous in avoiding shunt-related complications (infection, malfunction), and its indications are expanding for obstructive hydrocephalus. Further evidence accumulation is awaited regarding how much early relief of hydrocephalus contributes to visual function improvement in Parinaud syndrome.
For pineal germ cell tumors, multimodal treatment combining radiotherapy and chemotherapy (carboplatin, etoposide, etc.) is becoming standardized. Optimization of the indications for craniospinal irradiation and the intensity of chemotherapy is under continuous study.
In hydrocephalus-associated Parinaud syndrome, early relief of intracranial pressure may quickly reduce compression on the pretectal area, contributing to improvement in visual function and eye movements. Development of methods to quantitatively track the course of upward gaze palsy is also progressing.
Shields M, Sinkar S, Chan W, Crompton J. Parinaud syndrome: a 25-year (1991-2016) review of 40 consecutive adult cases. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017;95(8):e792-e793. PMID: 27778456. doi:10.1111/aos.13283 ↩ ↩2 ↩3
Ortiz JF, Eissa-Garcés A, Ruxmohan S, et al. Understanding Parinaud’s Syndrome. Brain Sci. 2021;11(11):1469. PMID: 34827468. PMC: PMC8615667. doi:10.3390/brainsci11111469 ↩ ↩2
Hoehn ME, Calderwood J, O’Donnell T, Armstrong GT, Gajjar A. Children with dorsal midbrain syndrome as a result of pineal tumors. J AAPOS. 2017;21(1):34-38. PMID: 28069468. doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2016.09.024 ↩ ↩2
Vuppala AA, Hura N, Sahraian S, Beheshtian E, Miller NR, Yousem DM. MRI findings in Parinaud’s syndrome: a closer look at pineal masses. Neuroradiology. 2019;61(5):507-514. PMID: 30684115. doi:10.1007/s00234-019-02166-4 ↩
Hura N, Vuppala AD, Sahraian S, Beheshtian E, Miller NR, Yousem DM. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in Parinaud’s syndrome: comparing pineal mass findings to other etiologies. Clin Imaging. 2019;58:124-130. PMID: 31377440. doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2019.07.010 ↩