CGRP Receptor Target
erenumab: A humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to the CGRP receptor.
Administered subcutaneously at 70 mg or 140 mg once a month.
CGRP (calcitonin gene-related peptide) is a neuropeptide produced by neurons in the trigeminal ganglion. Its effects on intracranial blood vessels and the trigeminal system are closely linked to the pathophysiology of migraine. Anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (CGRP antibodies) are a class of preventive migraine medications that target CGRP itself or its receptor.
Expression of CGRP in the trigeminal ganglion was confirmed over 30 years ago3). For small-molecule CGRP receptor antagonists (gepants), olcegepant (intravenous) first demonstrated efficacy for acute migraine in 20043). Monoclonal antibody preparations have been approved sequentially since 20188).
Migraine affects approximately 1.02 billion people worldwide and is the second leading cause of disability globally3,8). Conventional migraine preventives (beta-blockers, antiepileptics, tricyclic antidepressants, etc.) reduce monthly migraine days by 50% or more in fewer than 45% of patients3). CGRP antibodies are the first migraine-specific preventive drug class to address this treatment gap.
There are currently four approved anti-CGRP antibodies. They are classified into two groups based on their target of action.
CGRP Receptor Target
erenumab: A humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to the CGRP receptor.
Administered subcutaneously at 70 mg or 140 mg once a month.
CGRP Ligand Target
fremanezumab: A fully humanized IgG2Δa. Administered subcutaneously at 225 mg once a month or 675 mg every 3 months.
galcanezumab: Initial dose 240 mg, then 120 mg subcutaneously once monthly.
eptinezumab: 100–300 mg intravenously every 3 months.
Gepants (small-molecule CGRP receptor antagonists) include ubrogepant and rimegepant for acute treatment, and rimegepant and atogepant for preventive treatment4,7).
In 2024, the American Headache Society (AHS) stated that the evidence for CGRP-targeted therapies is “overwhelmingly greater than any other preventive treatment approach” and recommends them as first-line for migraine prevention without requiring prior failure of other preventive drug classes4).
Conventional drugs (e.g., beta-blockers, antiepileptics) were developed for indications other than migraine, and fewer than 45% of patients achieve ≥50% symptom reduction3). In contrast, CGRP antibodies are the first migraine-specific preventive drug class targeting the core pathophysiology (excess CGRP in the trigeminovascular system), and in 2024 the AHS recommends them as first-line even without prior failure of other preventives4).
The main indication for CGRP antibodies is migraine, and the typical symptoms of migraine targeted for treatment are as follows.
The possibility that anti-CGRP antibodies may also affect the retina has been reported in studies using optical coherence tomography (OCT).
In a retrospective study comparing migraine patients (16 patients, 32 eyes) and healthy controls (10 subjects, 20 eyes), the following differences were observed before anti-CGRP antibody administration1).
Changes after 6 months of treatment with anti-CGRP antibodies (fremanezumab 50%, galcanezumab 25%, erenumab 25%) were as follows1).
The following shows changes in key clinical parameters from the same study.
| Parameter | Baseline | 6 months | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly migraine days (MMD) | 15.6±3.8 | 5.4±1.5 | <0.0001 |
| MIDAS | 65.6±49.6 | 13.7±10.8 | <0.0001 |
| HIT-6 | 68.6±3.9 | 58.6±3.4 | <0.0001 |
| Monthly analgesic use days | 17±7.8 | 4.8±1.9 | <0.0001 |
After 6 months, the temporal superior RNFL significantly increased (p=0.02), and the peripapillary inferior hemifield and inferotemporal RPC vessel density also significantly increased (p=0.03, p=0.02)1). In repeated measures ANOVA with monthly migraine days as a covariate, only the change in temporal superior RNFL was significant (F=13.69, p=0.001)1).
OCT studies have reported thinning of the nasal RNFL and thickening of the temporal RNFL in migraine patients, indicating retinal structural changes different from healthy individuals1). Additionally, after 6 months of anti-CGRP antibody treatment, the temporal superior RNFL and RPC vessel density significantly increased, suggesting that endogenous CGRP may be involved in retinal vascular perfusion1).
The main pathophysiology of migraine is activation of the trigeminovascular system (TVS). The previously proposed vascular theory that intracranial vasodilation is the direct cause of pain is now rejected3).
Neurons in the trigeminal ganglion produce CGRP, and intracranial vascular tissues express CGRP receptors (G protein-coupled). The following three pathways have been shown for CGRP to trigger migraine.
Exogenous administration of CGRP reproduces migraine-like symptoms, and intracranial CGRP levels are confirmed to be significantly elevated during migraine attacks.
For the diagnosis of migraine without aura, at least 5 attacks are required, and each attack must meet the following criteria3).
The aura of migraine with aura consists of fully reversible neurological symptoms (visual, sensory, speech/language, motor, or brainstem symptoms) that develop gradually over ≥5 minutes and each symptom lasts 5–60 minutes3).
If any of the following warning signs are present, further investigation to rule out secondary headache is necessary3).
OCT/OCT-A is used to evaluate retinal structural and vascular changes in migraine patients. It enables quantitative assessment of quadrant-specific RNFL changes (nasal thinning and temporal thickening) and changes in vascular perfusion after treatment 1). Currently, its use is primarily research-based, but its significance as a diagnostic aid in neuro-ophthalmology is gaining attention.
All four anti-CGRP antibodies have demonstrated efficacy in preventing episodic and chronic migraine in RCTs 3), reducing monthly migraine days by 1–2.8 days and monthly migraine hours by 22.7–30.4 hours. Meta-analyses show no significant differences in safety or efficacy among the four agents.
The administration methods for each drug are shown below.
| Drug name | Dose | Dosing interval and route |
|---|---|---|
| erenumab | 70 or 140 mg | Once monthly, subcutaneous injection |
| fremanezumab | 225 mg or 675 mg | Once monthly or every 3 months, subcutaneous injection9) |
| galcanezumab | Initial 240 mg, then 120 mg | Once monthly, subcutaneous injection |
| eptinezumab | 100–300 mg | Every 3 months, intravenous administration |
Fremanezumab is a fully humanized IgG2Δa that binds to the CGRP ligand, and its efficacy was validated in the phase 3 placebo-controlled HALO CM (chronic migraine) and HALO EM (episodic migraine) trials (12 weeks) 9). The FOCUS trial confirmed efficacy even in patients with an inadequate response to 2–4 classes of preventive medications 9).
The half-life is long, ranging from several weeks to several months, and it does not cross the blood-brain barrier. Because it is metabolized into peptides and amino acids, the risk of drug interactions and liver toxicity is low. Safety during pregnancy has not been established.
The use of erenumab for migraine-like headache associated with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) has been reported.
Efficacy
Open-label trial (55 patients): Moderate to severe headache days decreased by 71%, total headache days decreased by 45% (from baseline to 12 months). Analgesic use days also significantly decreased3).
Case series (7 patients): Erenumab showed marked efficacy for migraine-like headaches persisting after resolution of papilledema 6).
Cautions
Recurrence of papilledema: In an open-label trial, papilledema recurred without headache in 7 cases 3). In a case series, papilledema reappeared while headache remained controlled in cases with recurrent intracranial hypertension 6).
Need for monitoring: Improvement in headache does not indicate resolution of papilledema. Continued ophthalmologic surveillance is essential 6).
Meta-analyses have not shown significant differences in safety or efficacy among the four agents. Erenumab targets the CGRP receptor, while the other three target the CGRP ligand, differing in mechanism of action, but no clear difference in clinical outcomes has been demonstrated to date. Route of administration (subcutaneous vs. intravenous) and dosing interval (monthly vs. every 3 months) serve as practical criteria for selection.
In an open-label trial of 55 IIH patients, erenumab reduced moderate-to-severe headache days by 71% 3). However, papilledema recurred in some cases even after headache resolution, indicating that headache improvement does not imply control of intracranial pressure. Continued ophthalmologic surveillance is essential 6).
Adverse events are generally mild to moderate. However, case reports of inflammatory complications (autoimmune hepatitis, Susac syndrome, psoriatic arthritis) exist 2), and in patients with pre-existing vascular diseases (e.g., Behçet disease), a risk of permanent visual impairment has been reported 5). In patients with vascular disease, the appropriateness of administration must be carefully assessed.
CGRP is a neuropeptide produced in pseudounipolar neurons of the trigeminal ganglion, and its role was discovered over 30 years ago 3). Intracranial blood vessels express CGRP receptors (G protein-coupled), establishing neurovascular signaling with trigeminal ganglion neurons.
During migraine attacks, CGRP is released from trigeminal nerve endings. The three pathophysiological pathways triggered are as follows:
Anti-CGRP antibodies inhibit these three pathways by binding to the CGRP ligand or CGRP receptor. Since they do not cross the blood-brain barrier, their main effects are exerted peripherally (around trigeminal nerve endings and dural blood vessels).
CGRP also has anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects, influencing the function of NK cells, dendritic cells, and bone marrow myeloid progenitor cells 2). When inhibitory control over these cells is removed by CGRP inhibition, a pro-inflammatory response may be triggered 2). This has been suggested as the pathological mechanism for inflammatory complications (see “Precautions and Side Effects in Treatment” section).
Regarding effects on the retina, it has been shown that activation of endogenous CGRP and its receptors may be involved in quadrant-specific RNFL changes and vascular perfusion changes in migraine patients 1). In IIH patients, it has been suggested that CGRP may function as a mechanistic driver of headache 6).
A retrospective study by Cesareo et al. (2025) reported that after 6 months of anti-CGRP antibody treatment, vascular perfusion in the superficial capillary plexus and radial peripapillary capillaries (RPC) increased, and the temporal superior RNFL significantly improved (p=0.02)1).
However, this study has the following limitations: the small sample size of 16 patients (32 eyes), the lack of evaluation during headache attacks, the absence of long-term follow-up data, and the lack of analysis by antibody type. Larger-scale studies are needed to determine whether retinal OCT/OCT-A can serve as a biomarker for evaluating the therapeutic effect of anti-CGRP antibodies and for migraine management 1).
It has been reported that tear CGRP levels are elevated in migraine patients and decrease after anti-CGRP antibody administration. This non-invasive method of tear collection is attracting attention for biochemical monitoring of migraine, but further research is needed for diagnostic and therapeutic applications.
Yiangou et al. (2020) reported that administration of erenumab to 7 IIH patients whose papilledema had resolved but who still had migraine-like headaches resulted in marked headache improvement in all cases 6). Even in cases where intracranial pressure rose again and papilledema recurred, headache control was maintained.
This finding suggests that CGRP may be a mechanistic driver of IIH-related headaches, but it should be noted that headache control does not replace monitoring of intracranial pressure. Ophthalmic surveillance should be continued, especially during weight fluctuations 6).
Ray et al. (2021) reported 8 cases of autoimmune hepatitis, Susac syndrome, and psoriatic arthritis that occurred in close temporal association with anti-CGRP antibody administration 2).
Based on the immunomodulatory effects of CGRP, it has been hypothesized that CGRP inhibition may unmask pre-existing autoimmune predisposition. Immunological studies are needed to identify which patient groups are at high risk 2).
Khan et al. (2025) reported a case of a patient with well-controlled Behçet’s disease who developed painless bilateral vision loss 11 days after the second injection of erenumab, resulting in permanent visual impairment despite steroid treatment 5).
It has been hypothesized that CGRP may function as a physiological compensatory mechanism for vasoconstriction, and that CGRP receptor inhibition may impair compensatory vasodilation to ischemia caused by BD-related small vessel vasculitis 5). Research is needed to clarify the scope of contraindications and precautions in patients with vasculitis and ischemic vascular disease.