Skip to content
Cataract & Anterior Segment

Creation of Incisions in Cataract Surgery

In cataract surgery (phacoemulsification; PEA), incision creation is the foundational step for all surgical stages. A properly constructed incision maintains anterior chamber stability, facilitates intraoperative maneuvers, and contributes to postoperative infection prevention and early recovery. Conversely, an inadequate wound increases the risk of intraoperative and postoperative complications such as wound leakage, endophthalmitis, and surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) 1).

Incision methods are broadly classified into clear corneal incision (CCI) and scleral incision. According to a 2003 survey by the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS), the utilization rate of CCI reached 72%, a significant increase from 1.5% in 1992. CCI is the mainstream approach in modern cataract surgery, but scleral incisions also have inherent advantages. Additionally, the intermediate transconjunctival single-plane sclerocorneal incision is widely performed.

The width of the incision is generally around 2.4 mm, sufficient to insert the ultrasound tip and sleeve. The advent of foldable intraocular lenses (IOLs) has enabled smaller incisions, contributing to reduced SIA.

2. Types and characteristics of incision methods

Section titled “2. Types and characteristics of incision methods”

This method creates a tunnel within the corneal stroma and enters the anterior chamber. It has the following characteristics:

  • Self-sealing, sutureless: The valve-like wound closes with increased intraocular pressure.
  • Shorter operative time: No conjunctival manipulation is required, making the procedure simpler.
  • Rapid recovery: Good visual acuity is often achieved early after surgery.
  • Conjunctival preservation: The greatest advantage is that it does not compromise the outcome of future glaucoma filtration surgery.
  • Can be performed under topical anesthesia: Minimal invasiveness of local anesthesia.

On the other hand, CCI has the following limitations:

  • Risk of postoperative endophthalmitis: Wound leakage due to improper wound construction can lead to bacterial invasion 1). In a multicenter study by ESCRS, CCI was reported to have a 5.88 times higher risk of endophthalmitis compared to scleral tunnel incision (95% CI 1.34–25.9) 2). However, several large case series have found no significant difference between the two, so the assessment is not conclusive 1).
  • Increased SIA: Because the incision is made closer to the center of the cornea, SIA tends to be larger than with scleral incisions.
  • Corneal endothelial damage: There is a risk of endothelial cell loss and Descemet’s membrane detachment.
  • Wound burn: Can occur due to friction heat between the ultrasound tip and sleeve. Particular caution is needed in cases with hard nuclei.

This method involves incising the conjunctiva, making a half-thickness incision in the sclera about 1.5 mm posterior to the limbus, and creating a flap-like tunnel. It originated from the four-sided incision performed by Dobree in 1959 for intracapsular cataract extraction.

  • Low infection risk: The wound is covered by conjunctiva, preventing bacterial invasion.
  • High self-sealing ability: The tunnel structure is robust and closure is reliable.
  • Small SIA: Because the incision is made far from the center of the cornea, it has little effect on corneal shape.
  • Limited maneuverability: Involves conjunctival incision, adding steps. A tight wound may cause all-locking (restriction of instrument movement).
  • Bleeding risk: Anterior chamber hemorrhage (hyphema) from scleral vessels can occur.

In a three-plane sclerocorneal incision, the first plane is made with a diamond knife along the limbus to about two-thirds of the scleral depth, the second plane creates a tunnel of at least 2 mm with a crescent knife, and the third plane enters the anterior chamber with a slit knife.

Transconjunctival Single-Plane Sclerocorneal Incision

Section titled “Transconjunctival Single-Plane Sclerocorneal Incision”

This method is intermediate between sclerocorneal and corneal incisions. A slit knife is inserted from above the conjunctiva about 0.5 mm from the limbus, advanced within the sclera along the cornea with a tunnel length similar to the incision width, and finally punctured into the anterior chamber on the cornea.

Advantages:

  • No conjunctival incision is required, and damage to Tenon’s capsule is minimal.
  • The procedure is simple and can be performed with a feel similar to a corneal incision.
  • The wound is covered by conjunctiva, providing excellent infection protection.
  • The wound has better extensibility than a corneal incision, allowing a smaller wound for IOL insertion.

Disadvantages:

  • If the conjunctiva on both sides is not incised, irrigation fluid may enter the subconjunctival space, causing conjunctival edema.
  • The tunnel tends to become short, requiring caution especially in cases with narrow palpebral fissures.

The ideal tunnel length is 1.75–2.0 mm. An important technique is to consciously change the angle of the slit knife in three steps: (1) hold it slightly upright against the sclera near the limbus, (2) tilt it to advance between layers, and (3) raise it slightly to puncture the endothelial side.

Clear Corneal Incision

Conjunctival preservation: Does not compromise glaucoma surgery outcomes.

Surgery time: Short. Can be performed under topical anesthesia.

Infection risk: May increase when wound closure is incomplete

SIA: Tends to be slightly larger

Sclerocorneal incision

Infection protection: Superior due to conjunctival coverage

Self-sealing: High

SIA: Small

Operability: Many steps, risk of bleeding

Transconjunctival single-plane sclerocorneal incision

Position: Intermediate between the two

Conjunctival invasion: Minimal

Infection protection: Conjunctival coverage present

Tip: Change the blade angle in three stages

ItemCorneal incisionSclerocorneal incision
Conjunctival preservationPossibleImpossible
Self-sealing abilityRequires precise techniqueHigh
Corneal shape changeMoreLess
Q Which incision method is best?
A

Each has pros and cons; the choice should be based on the case and the surgeon’s experience. When conjunctival preservation is important, a corneal incision is preferred; to minimize infection risk, a sclerocorneal incision is chosen; and for a balance of both, a transconjunctival single-plane sclerocorneal incision is an option.

Paracentesis is an auxiliary entry route into the anterior chamber and is created for the following purposes:

  • Securing an injection route for viscoelastic substances or anesthetics
  • Instrument insertion port for bimanual technique

Usually, two ports are created at the corneal limbus at positions 2 to 3 hours away from the main incision (10 o’clock and 2 o’clock directions). Insert at the leading edge of the conjunctival vessels, and after passing through the endothelium, advance parallel to the iris. The incision width is approximately 0.8 mm, and the tunnel length is approximately 0.8 mm.

Using a dull blade increases the risk of Descemet’s membrane detachment, so replace damaged blades with new ones.

The incision location differs in distance from the central visual axis and affects the degree of SIA.

  • Temporal incision: SIA is smallest and currently most commonly used. This is because the temporal limbus is farther from the central visual axis than the superior limbus. It is less obstructed by the eyebrow, offers good operability, and is advantageous for reducing against-the-rule astigmatism common in elderly patients.
  • Superior incision: Recommended for with-the-rule astigmatism (>1.5D, steep meridian 90 degrees).
  • Nasal incision: Recommended for against-the-rule astigmatism (>0.75D, steep meridian 180 degrees). It is difficult as a practical main port but is used as a paired CCI.
  • Paired CCI: A pair of CCIs are created temporally and nasally, allowing reduction of larger corneal astigmatism (>1.5D) than a single CCI.

The incision location is 0.5 to 1.5 mm anterior to the limbus. A “near-clear” corneal incision that slightly damages the surrounding limbal vessels is preferred. True clear corneal incisions without vessels have delayed fibroblast response and take longer to heal.

  • Incision width: Matches the ultrasound tip, irrigation/aspiration tip, and IOL injector. At 1.8 to 2.2 mm, SIA is relatively small, and there is no significant difference in visual acuity or corneal astigmatism. Reducing from 3.2 mm to 2.2 mm decreases SIA, but the benefit of reducing from 2.2 mm to 1.8 mm is limited1).
  • Tunnel length: Short tunnels (<1.75 mm) have smaller SIA than long tunnels (>1.75 mm). However, if too short, the risk of wound leakage increases. For straight incisions, a tunnel length of 60% or more of the wound width is a guideline for self-sealing.
  • Shape: Square or nearly square CCIs are more stable than rectangular ones.
  • Structure (number of planes): Options include single-plane, biplane, and multiplane (three-plane). Multiplane incisions provide better wound closure than single- or biplane incisions and reduce the risk of bacterial contamination fluid inflow1).

If preoperative corneal astigmatism exceeds 0.50 D, making the incision on the steepest meridian reduces postoperative astigmatism1).

4. Wound Closure and Endophthalmitis Prevention

Section titled “4. Wound Closure and Endophthalmitis Prevention”

Establishing a watertight self-sealing wound is key to infection prevention1). Methods of wound closure include the following.

  • Stromal hydration: Inject BSS (balanced salt solution) into the corneal stroma at the wound to swell the cornea and promote self-sealing.
  • Intraocular pressure check: According to Ernest, the self-sealing function of the internal corneal valve is activated at an IOP of 10 mmHg or higher. Inject BSS through the side port and confirm that the IOP is sufficiently high before finishing. Not finishing with low IOP is the most important point for endophthalmitis prevention.
  • Suturing: If closure cannot be achieved with hydration, suture with 10-0 Prolene.

The incidence of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery in the United States from 2013 to 2017 is estimated at approximately 0.04%1). Risk factors for postoperative endophthalmitis include the following.

  • Wound leakage on postoperative day 11)
  • Intraoperative posterior capsule rupture/vitreous loss1)
  • Prolonged surgical time1)
  • Non-use of prophylactic intracameral antibiotics (cefuroxime 1 mg/0.1 mL)2)

In the ESCRS prospective multicenter study, the risk of endophthalmitis was 4.92 times higher (95% CI 1.87–12.9) when intracameral cefuroxime was not administered2). Use of silicone IOLs was also associated with increased risk (OR 3.13; 95% CI 1.47–6.67)2).

Q Does the risk of endophthalmitis differ between corneal and scleral incisions?
A

The ESCRS study reported a 5.88-fold risk increase with CCI2), but several large studies have found no significant difference between the two1). The type of incision is less important than watertight wound closure and appropriate infection prevention measures.

This is a complication that tends to occur with corneoscleral incisions. Causes include incision placement away from the limbus, and the tip of the crescent knife pointing toward the anterior chamber during lamellar dissection. It can be prevented by lifting the knife tip upward.

Failure to consider the difference in curvature radius between the sclera and cornea can result in an excessively short corneal tunnel, leading to early perforation.

This often occurs following early perforation. Intraoperative floppy iris syndrome (IFIS) and incomplete wound construction (insufficient tunnel length or short internal lip) are also causes.

  • If mild, push back with ophthalmic viscosurgical device
  • If difficult, insert a hook through the opposite side port and reposition from inside the eye
  • Suture the wound at the prolapse site while avoiding the iris with a spatula, and create a main incision at a different location.

Caused by friction heat between the ultrasound tip and sleeve. Causes include prolonged high-power ultrasound, insufficient irrigation, and ultrasound oscillation in an anterior chamber filled with viscoelastic material. Promote self-sealing with hydration; suture if inadequate.

Includes Descemet’s membrane detachment, corneal erosion, wound dehiscence due to minor trauma, and hyphema.

Q What to do if the wound does not close?
A

First, perform hydration (swelling of the corneal stroma by BSS injection) to promote self-sealing. If leakage persists, suture with 10-0 Prolene. If uncertain during surgery, it is safe to choose suturing.

This section explains the wound healing process and the mechanism of self-sealing.

Self-sealing in corneal incisions is achieved when the internal corneal valve is pressed against the external valve by intraocular pressure. The longer the tunnel structure, the larger the contact area between the valves and the stronger the sealing force. An intraocular pressure of at least 10 mmHg is necessary for the sealing function to work.

In multi-plane incisions, the stepped structure enhances valve interlocking, resulting in better wound closure than single-plane incisions. Incisions with a nearly square shape are less prone to valve displacement and have higher stability.

Relationship between Wound Leakage and Endophthalmitis

Section titled “Relationship between Wound Leakage and Endophthalmitis”

Inadequate wound closure allows inflow of extraocular fluid into the anterior chamber. Experiments using cadaver eyes have shown that India ink can penetrate into the anterior chamber through sutureless CCI, supporting the infection route via contaminated fluid inflow. Wound leakage is directly associated with the risk of endophthalmitis on the first postoperative day 1).

Vascularized “near-clear” corneal incisions promote faster fibroblast migration and enhanced healing compared to avascular “true clear” corneal incisions.


7. Latest Research and Future Perspectives (Investigational Reports)

Section titled “7. Latest Research and Future Perspectives (Investigational Reports)”

In femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS), the laser can be used for main incision, relaxing incision, anterior capsulotomy, and nuclear fragmentation 1). Compared to manual CCI, it can create incisions with superior morphology and integrity, and is expected to reduce wound leakage with reverse side-cut CCI.

A 2020 meta-analysis (73 studies, 12,769 eyes in FLACS group vs. 12,274 eyes in conventional group) reported significant improvements in uncorrected and corrected visual acuity at 1–3 months postoperatively, reduced cumulative ultrasound energy, improved roundness of anterior capsulotomy, and decreased central corneal thickness 1).

However, there is still no definitive evidence of cost-effectiveness superiority. Additionally, opening the main incision created by femtosecond laser can be difficult, and many surgeons use a metal or diamond keratome only for the main port.


  1. American Academy of Ophthalmology Cataract/Anterior Segment Preferred Practice Pattern Panel. Cataract in the Adult Eye Preferred Practice Pattern. Ophthalmology. 2022;129:P1-P126.
  2. Endophthalmitis Study Group, European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons. Prophylaxis of postoperative endophthalmitis following cataract surgery: results of the ESCRS multicenter study and identification of risk factors. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:978-988.

Copy the article text and paste it into your preferred AI assistant.