Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is a treatment that administers 100% oxygen in a pressurized environment exceeding 1.0 ATA (atmospheric pressure). The Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society (UHMS) defines it as requiring at least 1.4 ATA, and its effects are dose-dependent.
The chambers used are broadly classified into two types.
Monoplace chamber: Accommodates only one person, and the entire chamber is pressurized with 100% oxygen.
Multiplace chamber: Allows two or more people to enter simultaneously. The chamber itself is pressurized with compressed air, and patients inhale 100% oxygen via a mask, hood, or endotracheal tube.
The UHMS approves HBOT for 14 diseases/conditions. The category relevant to ophthalmology is “arterial insufficiency,” which includes CRAO and refractory ulcers. Other approved indications are as follows.
The history of HBOT is long. In 1662, Henshaw devised the first pressurized chamber called “Domicilium.” Junod in 1834 and Pravaz in 1837 further developed it, and in 1879 Fontaine introduced a pressurized operating room. In 1921, Cunningham built the world’s largest chamber, which was dismantled in 1937. In the 1930s, the U.S. Navy adopted HBOT for decompression sickness treatment, and Boerema demonstrated its usefulness in animal experiments. The predecessor organization of UHMS was established in 1967.
QWhat eye diseases is hyperbaric oxygen therapy used for?
The physiological effects of HBOT are due to a complex mechanism centered on the increase in plasma dissolved oxygen under high pressure.
Enhanced Oxygen Supply
Hemoglobin saturation: Under normal conditions, hemoglobin is almost fully saturated, and additional oxygen binding is limited.
Increased plasma dissolved oxygen: Under high pressure (Henry’s law), the amount of oxygen dissolved in plasma increases significantly, promoting oxygen delivery to tissues.
Bubble reduction: Under high pressure, bubble size decreases, allowing oxygen to reach small blood vessels more easily.
Effects on Blood Vessels and Cells
Vasoconstriction: Elevated oxygen levels reduce NO production, causing vasoconstriction. However, tissue oxygen supply is maintained due to the hyperoxic state. Rapid vasodilation occurs after HBOT ends.
Enhanced leukocyte function: Hyperoxia improves the oxidative bactericidal capacity of leukocytes.
Antibacterial effects: Suppresses the production of Clostridium toxins. Synergistic effects with fluoroquinolones, amphotericin B, and aminoglycosides have also been reported.
It has also been suggested that increased oxidants may function as cellular mediators, contributing to fibroblast proliferation and wound healing. For detailed mechanisms, see Section 6: Detailed Mechanism of Action.
The rationale for HBOT in CRAO is to enhance oxygen supply to the ischemic retina. During HBOT, reversible vasoconstriction occurs in the ocular vasculature, but the increase in plasma oxygen in the choriocapillaris allows the inner retina to maintain adequate oxygenation via oxygen supply from the choroidal side. Animal studies have shown that even with retinal artery occlusion, the retina is sufficiently oxygenated under HBOT. An intact choroidal circulation is a prerequisite for successful HBOT.
Clinical evidence for HBOT in CRAO is presented below.
Study design
Number of cases
Main results
Retrospective (2001)
HBOT group 35 vs control group 37
Visual improvement in 82% of HBOT group vs 29.7% in control
Clinical trial (2000)
Started 1 day after symptom onset
No significant difference
Cochrane review
Integration of multiple studies
Evidence uncertain, RCT needed
Retrospective case series suggest that HBOT provides a modest benefit for CRAO, but the Cochrane review points out the uncertainty of the evidence and calls for high-quality RCTs1). As part of the Eye stroke protocol, efforts are underway to reduce the time to HBOT initiation by placing fundus cameras and OCT in emergency departments1).
Time from symptom onset: Starting within a few hours is best. Irreversible damage is thought to begin 1.5 hours after retinal ischemia.
Cherry-red spot: May be more useful for prognosis than elapsed time.
Changes in macular thickness and DRIL (disorganization of retinal inner layers): Used for prognostic evaluation.
Cilioretinal artery collaterals: If present, they are a positive prognostic factor.
QWhen should HBOT for CRAO be started?
A
Starting within a few hours of symptom onset is considered best. Irreversible damage is thought to begin 1.5 hours after retinal ischemia, and a clinical trial that started HBOT one day after symptom onset did not show significant efficacy1). The presence or absence of a cherry-red spot may be more useful for prognosis than time.
Based on the hypothesis that a hyperoxic state reduces VEGF expression and improves disruption of the blood-retinal barrier (BRB). In cases of diabetic macular edema, 14 sessions of HBOT over one month improved visual acuity (right 20/125→20/63, left 20/320→20/160). In two clinical trials, 68% improved by 2 or more lines, with an average gain of 3.5 lines. A prospective cohort study also reported that HBOT has a thinning effect on the macula.
Radiation optic neuropathy: Some reports show improvement when treatment is started within 72 hours of onset, while others show no improvement in delayed cases, leading to conflicting reports.
NAION (Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy): A controlled trial by Arnold et al. did not show efficacy, but promising case reports exist. HBOT may exert neuroprotective effects by downregulating apoptosis-related genes2).
QIs HBOT effective for nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy?
A
Controlled trials have not shown efficacy, and it is not currently standard treatment. However, there is a hypothesis that HBOT provides neuroprotective effects by downregulating apoptosis-related genes, and promising case reports exist2). Evidence is conflicting, and further research is needed.
Scleral melting/necrosis: HBOT is considered promising for scleral necrosis caused by beta radiation or MMC (mitomycin C), with reports of increased episcleral blood flow and scleral thickness.
Ocular infections (mucormycosis): HBOT exerts direct antifungal activity by increasing free radical production and enhances the effect of amphotericin B.
Corneal edema/anterior segment ischemia: Use has been reported for anterior segment ischemia associated with sickle cell anemia.
Glaucoma: There are reports of visual field improvement without changes in intraocular pressure, and other reports showing a decrease in intraocular pressure.
Retinitis pigmentosa: Improvements in macular edema, visual acuity, and electroretinogram responses have been reported.
Others: Reports of use include macular hole surgery, toxic amblyopia, uveitis, and paracentral acute middle maculopathy (PAMM) (visual improvement after 14 HBOT sessions).
Oxygen convulsions: Effects on the central nervous system due to hyperoxia. Prevented by limiting session duration.
Middle ear barotrauma: Caused by eustachian tube dysfunction during pressurization and depressurization.
Pulmonary rupture: Complication due to lung overinflation during rapid decompression.
Claustrophobia: More common in monoplace chambers.
Temporary pulmonary dysfunction: May occur with long-term or high-frequency sessions.
Ophthalmic Complications
Hyperoxic myopia: Most frequent. Progresses by about 0.25 D per week, causing a change of 1 line or more in visual acuity in 60% of patients. Often resolves within 3–6 weeks after treatment ends.
Cataract formation: Oxidation of lens proteins due to reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. Requires caution with long-term treatment.
Eyelid twitching: Considered the most common sign of oxygen toxicity.
Increased intraocular pressure (in eyes with intraocular gas): Absolute contraindication. Causes severe elevation of intraocular pressure.
Hyperoxic myopia is the most common ocular complication experienced by patients undergoing HBOT.
Item
Details
Frequency
Approximately 60% of patients show a change of 1 line or more.
Progression Rate
Approximately 0.25 D per week
Range of Myopic Shift
0.5 to 5.5 D at 2.5 ATA (Lyne, 1978)
Recovery Period
Usually 3 to 6 weeks (up to 6 to 12 months)
Exception
Does not occur in pseudophakic eyes
Device difference
Less myopic shift with oronasal mask
At 2.4 ATA, the average myopic shift after 30 sessions is reported to be 0.95 D. Changes in lens structural proteins and water distribution are considered mechanisms (see Section 6: Detailed Mechanism of Action).
QCan hyperbaric oxygen therapy cause vision loss?
A
Hyperoxic myopia can occur, causing a change of one or more lines in visual acuity in about 60% of patients. It usually resolves within 3–6 weeks after treatment ends. However, myopic shift does not occur in pseudophakic eyes (eyes with artificial lenses). Also, long-term treatment can lead to cataract formation, which is irreversible.
According to Henry’s law, the amount of oxygen dissolved in plasma increases with higher pressure. Under normal conditions, plasma-dissolved oxygen is minimal, and oxygen delivery to tissues depends almost entirely on hemoglobin. However, inhaling 100% oxygen under high pressure significantly increases plasma-dissolved oxygen, enabling hemoglobin-independent tissue oxygen supply.
Paradoxical Relationship Between Vasoconstriction and Oxygen Supply
In CRAO, oxygen supply from the central retinal artery to the inner retina is blocked. Under HBOT, plasma oxygen in the choriocapillaris increases, promoting oxygen diffusion from the outer to the inner retina. This allows oxygen supply to all retinal layers if choroidal circulation is intact. This is why intact choroidal circulation is considered a prerequisite for successful HBOT.
Changes in the structural proteins (crystallins) and water distribution within the lens are thought to be the main cause of myopic shift. The hyperoxic environment accelerates oxidation of lens proteins, altering the refractive power of the lens. In pseudophakic eyes (with artificial lenses), this change does not occur because the natural lens is absent.
HBOT may exert neuroprotective effects by downregulating the expression of apoptosis-related genes2). This mechanism provides the theoretical basis for research into its application in optic neuropathies (e.g., non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy).
7. Latest Research and Future Perspectives (Investigational Reports)
Currently, evidence for HBOT in CRAO is mainly from retrospective studies and case series; the Cochrane Review points out this uncertainty and calls for RCTs1). With the spread of the Eye Stroke Protocol, systems are being developed to expedite fundus photography and OCT in emergency departments and reduce time to HBOT initiation1).
Expanding Indications for Diabetic Retinopathy and RVO
Small-scale studies are accumulating showing efficacy for diabetic retinopathy and retinal vein occlusion (RVO). In particular, the mechanisms of VEGF expression suppression and BRB protection are attracting attention, and research on combination effects with existing anti-VEGF therapy is expected.
Mechanistic studies are progressing showing that HBOT exerts neuroprotective effects by downregulating apoptosis-related genes 2). Evidence accumulation is expected, especially for NA-AION (non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy).
American Academy of Ophthalmology Preferred Practice Pattern Retina/Vitreous Committee. Retinal and Ophthalmic Artery Occlusions Preferred Practice Pattern. Ophthalmology. 2024.
Salvetat ML, Pellegrini F, Spadea L, et al. Non-Arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (NA-AION): A Comprehensive Overview. Vision. 2023;7:72.
Copy the article text and paste it into your preferred AI assistant.
Article copied to clipboard
Open an AI assistant below and paste the copied text into the chat box.