The vertical chop technique is one of the nuclear division methods in phacoemulsification. It is also called the “karate chop” technique.
Chop techniques are broadly divided into two types: “horizontal chop” and “vertical chop.” The horizontal chop technique was first reported by Dr. Kunihiro Nagahara in 1993 (ASCRS Seattle Annual Meeting), where the ultrasonic tip and chopper are brought toward each other on a horizontal plane to divide the nucleus. The vertical chop technique differs in that the chopping motion is performed on a vertical plane.
The phaco chop technique was devised by Nagahara et al. in 1993. Compared to the divide and conquer (D&C) technique, it reduces ultrasonic time and improves surgical efficiency, and has become widely adopted worldwide.
The main advantage of the chop technique is that nuclear division is achieved primarily by manual instrument force rather than ultrasonic energy, thereby reducing total energy load.
QWhat is the difference between the horizontal chop technique and the vertical chop technique?
A
In the horizontal chop technique (so-called phaco chop), the chopper is inserted under the anterior capsule from the continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis edge, placed at the equator, and moved horizontally toward the US tip. In the vertical chop technique (karate chop), the chopper is not inserted under the continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis; instead, it is inserted vertically from inside the continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis near the center of the anterior lens surface to split the nucleus. Therefore, the vertical chop technique has a lower risk of capsular damage, and the procedure is completed entirely within the continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis.
Since this section describes cataract surgery techniques, the “main symptoms” include general cataract findings and characteristic intraoperative findings.
Observation of nuclear color and opacity pattern using a slit-lamp microscope is fundamental. It is evaluated on a scale of Grade 1 to 5 according to the Emery-Little classification.
Grade
Slit-lamp Findings
Nuclear Hardness
1–2
Clear to white/yellow-white
Soft to moderately soft
3
Yellow
Moderate
4–5
Yellowish-brown to brown
Hard to extremely hard
Multiple studies have shown that phaco chop is the most efficient technique for hard nuclei (Grade 4–5) cataracts and causes less damage to the corneal endothelium.
Corneal endothelial cell density: Since hard nuclei require more ultrasound energy, check endothelial cell count preoperatively.
Pupil diameter and zonular status: Evaluate the dilated pupil size and zonular integrity to plan the surgical approach.
Axial length measurement: Essential before surgery for IOL power calculation. For hypermature cataracts, use ultrasound biometry because optical measurement is difficult.
Hydrodissection: Rotate the lens within the capsule and confirm free movement.
Steps specific to the vertical chop technique:
Aspiration of superficial cortex: Aspirate the superficial cortex and epinucleus without using ultrasound energy to expose the underlying nucleus.
Embedding the ultrasound tip: Embed the ultrasound tip deeply into the center of the nucleus under high vacuum to secure it.
Inserting the chopper into the nucleus: Insert a vertical chopper (with a sharp tip) into the nucleus.
Moving the chopper: Move the chopper toward the ultrasound tip.
Dividing the nucleus: Spread the instruments laterally to split the nucleus into two hemispheres.
Quadrant division: Rotate the lens 90 degrees, embed the tip into the center of the nucleus, and repeat the above steps to divide into four quadrants. For very hard nuclei, division into 8 to 16 segments may be performed.
Fragment removal: Aspirate and emulsify each fragment using the ultrasound probe.
Posterior capsule protection: When removing the last fragment, orient the chopper tip horizontally (not toward the posterior capsule) or switch to a spatula and place it between the fragment and the posterior capsule.
A representative instrument is the Koch-Nagahara Karate Chopper by Katena. This chopper features a sharp chopper on one end and a flat spatula on the other.
In the horizontal chop technique, a blunt paddle-shaped chopper must be slid under the capsule to “hook” the lens equator. This maneuver may cause the following issues.
Inserting the chopper beyond the capsulotomy margin poses a risk of capsular tear.
When pushing a hard nucleus with a blunt instrument, compressive stress accumulates, causing unexpected lens movement and stress on the zonules.
The vertical chop technique solves this problem as follows.
Sharp penetration: A sharp chopper penetrates the hard nucleus without resistance, preventing accumulation of compressive stress.
Adaptability to small pupils: The tip of the chopper is always visible in the surgical field, ensuring high safety in cases with small pupils.
Lens fibers have a lamellar orientation. The chopping method mechanically fractures along this natural structure, allowing more efficient nuclear division than indiscriminate use of ultrasonic energy.
7. Latest Research and Future Prospects (Research Stage Reports)
In femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS), mechanical nuclear division can be performed with a laser. This is expected to further reduce ultrasonic energy, but research is ongoing to determine whether it shows a significant advantage over conventional manual chopping techniques.
With the spread of micro-incision cataract surgery (MICS), the application of the vertical chop technique using smaller instruments is being investigated. Small incisions help reduce postoperative astigmatism and improve wound stability, but they also limit the operating space.
In developing regions where many patients present with advanced cataracts, the vertical chop technique is considered particularly useful as a versatile procedure capable of handling hard nuclei. Educational and dissemination activities from this perspective are also attracting attention.
Nagahara K. Phacoemulsification Chop Technique. American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) Annual Meeting in Seattle, Washington. 1993.
Chang DF. Converting to Phaco Chop: Why? Which technique? How? Ophthalmic Practice. 1999;17(4):202-210.