Skip to content
Neuro-ophthalmology

Balint syndrome

Balint syndrome is a rare visuospatial coordination disorder secondary to bilateral parieto-occipital lesions. It is defined by three signs.

  • Simultagnosia: Inability to visually recognize multiple objects at once.
  • Optic ataxia: Inability to accurately grasp objects under visual guidance despite normal muscle strength.
  • Oculomotor apraxia: Inability to voluntarily shift gaze without extraocular muscle palsy.

Impaired perception of distance between objects may also be added as a fourth element.

In 1909, Hungarian neurologist Rezső Balint first reported the condition. The initial description included inability to perceive multiple items in a visual scene simultaneously, inability to voluntarily shift gaze to a fixation target, and inability to reach with the right hand (left hand was possible). In 1919, Holmes and Horrax reported similar cases and suggested that the symptoms were due solely to visuospatial impairment, as there were no motor or sensory deficits. The term “Balint syndrome” was coined in 1954.

It is a rare disease with limited reported cases in the literature. Isolated corpus callosum infarction accounts for less than 1% of all strokes 1), and posterior circulation strokes account for approximately 20–25% of all strokes 2).

Q How rare is Balint syndrome?
A

This is an extremely rare disease with limited reported cases in the literature. Isolated corpus callosum infarction accounts for less than 1% of strokes 1), and cases due to typical bilateral watershed infarction are also rare. There may be cases that are overlooked as dementia or delirium.

  • In severe cases, visual and spatial recognition is markedly restricted, and patients behave “as if blind.”
  • Due to impaired depth and distance perception, patients frequently bump into objects or walls.
  • Optic ataxia causes difficulty eating and drinking (inability to reach and grasp objects).
  • Simultanagnosia causes difficulty reading (perceiving letters individually but unable to combine them into words).
  • The patient may not notice the visual impairment.
  • In some cases, family members notice the abnormality and bring the patient for consultation.
  • In SSPE-related cases, symptoms such as prosopagnosia (inability to recognize faces), difficulty recognizing large letters, and bumping into walls have been reported as preceding signs3).

The characteristics of the three main signs of Balint syndrome are shown below.

Simultanagnosia

Definition: Inability to visually recognize multiple objects at once. The classic description is “cannot see the forest for the trees.”

Dorsal type (bilateral parietal lobe lesions): Inability to see multiple objects within the same scene. Bumps into objects while moving.

Ventral type (left inferior occipitotemporal lobe lesions): Can see multiple items but cannot conceptualize the entire scene. Less likely to bump into objects.

Optic Ataxia

Definition: Inability to accurately point or reach for objects under visual guidance despite normal muscle strength.

Features: Movements can be guided by sound or touch. There is an impairment in converting visual input into motor actions.

Ocular motor apraxia

Definition: Inability to voluntarily shift gaze without paralysis of the extraocular muscles. Balint described it as “psychic paralysis of gaze,” and Holmes as “spasm of fixation.”

Features: Involuntary reflexive saccades are preserved. In acquired cases, smooth pursuit movements are also lost, but the vestibulo-ocular reflex is preserved.

  • May include loss of the blink reflex to visual threat and bilateral inferior horizontal hemianopia.
  • May be accompanied by unilateral spatial neglect, extinction phenomenon, and astereognosis 1).
  • There have been cases complicated by Gerstmann syndrome (left-right disorientation, acalculia, finger agnosia) 1).
Q What is the difference between the "dorsal type" and "ventral type" of simultanagnosia?
A

The dorsal type is caused by bilateral parietal lobe lesions, where the patient cannot recognize multiple objects within the same scene, leading to bumping into objects while moving. The ventral type is caused by left inferior occipitotemporal lobe lesions, where multiple items can be seen but the overall scene cannot be conceptualized. The ventral type is characterized by fewer problems with bumping into objects.

The diseases that cause Balint syndrome are diverse. The following table shows the main categories of causes.

The causes are broadly classified into three categories.

CategoryRepresentative diseases/conditions
Cerebrovascular disordersWatershed infarction, corpus callosum infarction, cerebral hemorrhage
Neurodegenerative diseasesAlzheimer’s disease, posterior cortical atrophy, corticobasal degeneration
Infectious diseases and othersSSPE, CJD, COVID-19-related thrombosis, brain tumor, PRES

The most common cause is bilateral parieto-occipital lobe infarction, particularly watershed infarction at the MCA-PCA border. Watershed areas are susceptible to hypoperfusion and cardiac arrest. Posterior circulation stroke accounts for approximately 20-25% of all strokes2).

Isolated bilateral infarction of the corpus callosum (body and splenium) can also cause Balint syndrome1). This is an important report because it can occur without direct parietal lesions. Isolated callosal infarction is rare (<1% of strokes), as the corpus callosum receives dual blood supply from the ACA and PCA1).

Risk factors for cerebrovascular disorders include hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, arteriosclerosis, smoking, and coronary artery disease.

  • Alzheimer disease · Posterior cortical atrophy (also called visual variant of Alzheimer disease)
  • Corticobasal degeneration
  • SSPE (subacute sclerosing panencephalitis): A case report of a 22-year-old man presenting with Balint syndrome as the initial symptom3).
  • COVID-19 related: Bilateral parieto-occipital lobe infarction due to diffuse thrombosis associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection4).
  • Others: CJD, subacute HIV encephalitis, cerebral toxoplasmosis, NMDA receptor encephalitis, brain tumors (including metastases), PRES, PML, RCVS, traumatic brain injury.

There are no specific diagnostic criteria. Clinical diagnosis is made based on the presence of the triad (simultanagnosia + optic ataxia + oculomotor apraxia).

The following methods are useful for detecting simultanagnosia.

  • Interpretation of complex scenes: Ask the patient to describe a picture depicting multiple people or objects, such as the “Boston Cookie Theft Picture” or “Telegraph Boy.”
  • Ishihara color vision test: Although originally a color vision test, patients with simultanagnosia may have difficulty recognizing numbers (not due to color vision deficiency).
  • Navon figures: Present small letters that form a large letter. The patient may recognize the many small “S”s but fail to recognize the large “T” they form 4).
  • Confrontation testing: Simultanagnosia may be detected by confrontation testing even when quantitative visual field measurement is normal.
  • Non-contrast head CT: Initial test to rule out intracranial hemorrhage. Confirms hypodense areas of infarction.
  • MRI (including DWI): Identifies bilateral parieto-occipital lobe damage due to ischemia, hemorrhage, tumor, or cortical atrophy. DWI can detect ischemic changes within hours of onset. MRI shows T2/FLAIR hyperintensity in the bilateral parieto-occipital lobes3).
  • MRA and cerebral angiography: Used to identify the responsible blood vessel.
  • SPECT: May show decreased cerebral perfusion.
  • CT angiogram: Used to evaluate large vessel occlusion1).

A comparison with the main differential diagnoses is shown.

FeatureBalint syndromeHemispatial neglectCortical blindness
Lesion sideBilateral parieto-occipital lobesRight parietal junction (unilateral)Bilateral occipital lobes
Visual acuityMay be preservedPreservedDecreased
Light reflexPreservedPreservedPreserved

Unilateral spatial neglect shows similar findings such as visual search deficits, visually guided action deficits, and extinction phenomena, but differs in that it is a unilateral lesion. Cortical blindness presents with bilateral visual acuity loss, but the pupillary light reflex is preserved. If the calcarine fissure is preserved bilaterally, cortical blindness is ruled out4). In elderly patients, it is easily misdiagnosed as delirium, dementia, or cortical blindness2).

Q How do you distinguish Balint syndrome from cortical blindness?
A

Cortical blindness results from bilateral occipital lobe damage causing loss of vision in both eyes, but the pupillary light reflex is preserved. In Balint syndrome, if the calcarine fissure is preserved bilaterally, cortical blindness can be ruled out, and vision may be preserved4). The presence of simultanagnosia can be assessed by checking responses to Navon figures or complex scene descriptions.

There is no specific treatment for Balint syndrome. Addressing the underlying cause is the first priority.

  • Hyperacute cerebral infarction: Consider t-PA thrombolytic therapy and endovascular treatment.
  • Prevention of cerebral infarction recurrence: Use antiplatelet drugs (e.g., aspirin) or anticoagulants (e.g., warfarin). In case reports, aspirin 81 mg/day has been initiated1).
  • Cardiogenic cerebral embolism: Search for embolic source is important; if atrial fibrillation etc. is found, select anticoagulant therapy.

For visual-related central nervous system deficits, perform corresponding rehabilitation. There are two approaches.

  • Compensation: Improve intact functions to compensate for lost functions. Considered most beneficial.
  • Restoration: Training impaired functions to activate damaged brain areas. There are studies that have succeeded with a restorative approach using eye movement and convergence exercises.

Improvement has been reported in cases through neurorehabilitation focusing on visuospatial and visuomotor retraining2).

Depends on the underlying disease.

  • Acute causes (cerebral infarction, infection, etc.): If properly managed, there is potential for a good prognosis. Dramatic improvement two months after discharge has been reported in COVID-19-related cases4).
  • Progressive neurodegenerative diseases (Alzheimer’s disease, posterior cortical atrophy, etc.): Usually have a poor prognosis.
  • Recovery of visual field defects after cerebral infarction is poor in elderly patients, but may occur in younger patients.
Q What methods are available for rehabilitation of Balint syndrome?
A

There are two approaches: compensatory and restorative. Compensatory methods enhance intact functions to compensate for lost functions and are considered most beneficial. Restorative methods aim to recover impaired functions using eye movement and convergence exercises, with some successful studies reported. Improvement has also been seen in some cases with neurorehabilitation focused on visuospatial and visuomotor retraining 2).

6. Pathophysiology and detailed pathogenesis

Section titled “6. Pathophysiology and detailed pathogenesis”

Balint syndrome is caused by damage to the bilateral dorsolateral pathways.

  • Simultanagnosia: Due to damage to the visuospatial attention system of the parietal lobe. It is associated with lesions in Brodmann areas 7, 10, and 39, and may also involve deficits in visual processing speed. It results from disruption of connections to the dorsal parietal lobe.
  • Optic ataxia: Caused by lesions in the superior parietal lobule and the intraparietal sulcus region. It is associated with Brodmann areas 5, 7, 19, 37, and 39, and results from disconnection between the occipital lobe and the motor centers of the frontal lobe. It arises from disruption of connections from V1 to the frontal eye fields.
  • Oculomotor apraxia: Caused by disconnection between the occipital lobe and the frontal eye fields (Brodmann area 8). It involves damage to descending pathways from the frontal and parietal eye fields to the superior colliculus and brainstem. It results from disruption of connections from V1 to the frontal eye fields.

Diversity of localization and neural networks

Section titled “Diversity of localization and neural networks”

In addition to the classic bilateral parietal lobes, lesions involving the bifrontal cortex, pulvinar, Brodmann areas 6 and 8, and the mesial right temporo-occipital area have been reported 1).

From the perspective of neural networks, the following has been demonstrated1).

  • Attention network: Converges bilaterally on the dorsal frontoparietal network and the midcingulate-insular network (fMRI study by Markett 2022).
  • Visual working memory: Increased connectivity within the fronto-opercular network + dorsal attention network (intraparietal sulcus + frontal eye fields) + angular gyrus-cerebellar network are involved (fMRI study by Li 2024).
  • These higher-order functions require bilateral cortical connections, suggesting the involvement of interhemispheric commissural fibers including the corpus callosum.

There are two pathways in visual processing.

  • Dorsal pathway (where pathway): Involved in spatial location and motion vision in area V5.
  • Ventral pathway (what pathway): Involved in form and color vision in area V4.

All three signs of Balint syndrome reflect damage to the dorsal pathway.

7. Latest Research and Future Perspectives (Research Stage Reports)

Section titled “7. Latest Research and Future Perspectives (Research Stage Reports)”

New Findings on Corpus Callosum Lesions and Balint Syndrome

Section titled “New Findings on Corpus Callosum Lesions and Balint Syndrome”

Changlai & Liang (2025) reported a case of a 30-year-old man with isolated corpus callosum (body and splenium) infarction presenting with Balint syndrome1). Despite the absence of direct parietal lobe lesions, Balint syndrome developed, suggesting that the corpus callosum is part of the neural network for attention and visual working memory. Citing fMRI studies, it was shown that fiber coherence of the bilateral superior longitudinal fasciculus and inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus is related to the accuracy of visual working memory.

Storti et al. (2021) reported a case of a 65-year-old woman with Balint syndrome due to bilateral parieto-occipital lobe infarction caused by diffuse thrombosis associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection4). Confirmation of simultanagnosia using Navon figures and exclusion of cortical blindness due to preservation of the calcarine sulcus were key to diagnosis. Dramatic symptom improvement was recorded two months after discharge, making this an important case demonstrating the potential for recovery in acute cerebral infarction.

Balint Syndrome as an Initial Symptom of SSPE

Section titled “Balint Syndrome as an Initial Symptom of SSPE”

Parida et al. (2025) reported an extremely rare case of a 22-year-old male with SSPE presenting with Balint syndrome (prosopagnosia, simultanagnosia, optic ataxia, and oculomotor apraxia) as the initial symptom 3). CSF IgG measles antibody was elevated at 16,578 U/mL. Treatment (clobazam 20 mg twice daily, levetiracetam 40 mg/kg/day, isoprenosine 100 mg/kg/day in three divided doses, IFN-α 3 MU/week) was ineffective, and the patient died. Recognition of Balint syndrome as an atypical initial presentation of SSPE is important.


  1. Changlai T, Liang B. Balint syndrome in a patient with isolated corpus callosum stroke: a case study with narrative review. Cureus. 2025;17(6):e85402.
  2. Khan B, Arif A, Elnagi F. Between the borders: Balint syndrome as a rare manifestation of posterior circulation stroke. Cureus. 2025;17(11):e97550.
  3. Parida S, Pandey N, Kumar A, et al. An interesting case of subacute sclerosing panencephalitis presenting with Balint’s syndrome and dysautonomia. Encephalitis. 2025;5(2).
  4. Storti B, Cereda D, Balducci C, et al. Who is really blind in the time of coronavirus: the patient or the doctor? A rare case of Balint’s syndrome. Neurol Sci. 2021;42(5):2079-2080.

Copy the article text and paste it into your preferred AI assistant.