The incidence is extremely rare. No large-scale epidemiological studies exist, and reports are mainly case reports 2)5). The most common cause is cerebrovascular disease, followed by demyelinating diseases (e.g., multiple sclerosis) 2)4).
QWhat is the origin of the name "8.5"?
A
It is derived by adding the “7” of the seventh cranial nerve (facial nerve) to the “1.5” of one-and-a-half syndrome (horizontal gaze palsy + internuclear ophthalmoplegia), totaling 8.5. It was named by Eggenberger in 1998.
The three findings that constitute the 8.5 syndrome are shown below.
Horizontal Gaze Palsy
Inability to gaze conjugately to the ipsilateral side: Horizontal eye movement toward the affected side is limited in both eyes.
Conjugate deviation: In the acute phase, there may be a brief deviation toward the healthy side when looking straight ahead.
Gaze-evoked nystagmus: Appears when looking toward the affected side.
Internuclear Ophthalmoplegia
Limited adduction on the affected side: Characterized by a marked decrease in adduction speed, which tends to persist even after the limitation of movement resolves.
Nystagmus in the abducting eye on the healthy side: This is a monocular nystagmus called dissociated rhythmic nystagmus.
Convergence preservation: Convergence is possible even with MLF lesions.
Facial nerve palsy
Peripheral (LMN type): Inability to wrinkle the forehead, accompanied by incomplete eyelid closure. Unlike the upper motor neuron type, there is forehead paralysis.
Nasolabial fold flattening and mouth angle deviation: The nasolabial fold on the affected side disappears, and the mouth angle deviates to the healthy side.
The only remaining horizontal eye movement is abduction of the contralateral eye. In primary position, the affected eye is exotropic, called paralytic pontine exotropia.
QIs horizontal eye movement completely lost?
A
It is not completely lost. Only abduction of the contralateral eye remains. Also, adduction during convergence is preserved, so adduction during near vision is possible.
Cerebrovascular disease: The most common cause. Ischemic infarction in the territory of the paramedian pontine artery (a branch of the basilar artery) is typical 2)3). Pontine hemorrhage can also be a cause.
Demyelinating disease: Multiple sclerosis is representative. It is more common in young people 4).
Confirmation of horizontal gaze palsy: Confirm that both eyes do not move toward the affected side. Deviation toward the healthy side during upward or downward gaze is also an important finding.
Confirmation of internuclear ophthalmoplegia: Confirm adduction limitation on the affected side. Monocular nystagmus in the abducting eye of the healthy side is easier to observe immediately after rapid gaze toward the healthy side.
Confirmation of 1.5 syndrome: Confirm that all horizontal eye movements except abduction of the healthy eye are restricted.
Confirmation of facial nerve palsy: Evaluate asymmetry in forehead wrinkling, eye closure, and lip pursing. If the forehead is affected, it can be determined as LMN type.
MRI: Most useful for detecting brainstem lesions. Lesions showing high signal on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and low signal on ADC images suggest cerebral infarction. Even small lesions of a few millimeters can be detected2). Coronal sections in addition to axial imaging of the brainstem are useful.
CT: Low sensitivity for acute cerebral infarction. If brainstem infarction is clinically suspected despite normal CT, MRI is necessary2). Useful for excluding hemorrhage.
Myasthenia gravis: May present with pseudo-MLF syndrome. Check for diurnal variation and easy fatigability.
Fisher syndrome: May show findings similar to internuclear ophthalmoplegia. Check for loss of tendon reflexes and ataxia.
QCan 8.5 syndrome not be ruled out even if CT is normal?
A
It cannot be ruled out. CT has low sensitivity for acute cerebral infarction, and a normal finding may miss brainstem infarction. If clinically suspected, MRI is necessary.
In isolated 8.5 syndrome, the prognosis for diplopia and facial nerve palsy is good. Abducens palsy tends to persist longer than adducens palsy.
Muhammad et al. (2024) reported a case of 8.5 syndrome due to brainstem infarction in a 55-year-old man. After treatment with antiplatelet drugs, the ophthalmoplegia completely recovered within 3 months, and only slight residual facial nerve palsy remained2).
Ingle et al. (2021) reported a case of pontine infarction combined with acute myocardial infarction in a 54-year-old man. Dual antiplatelet therapy and physical therapy were administered, and improvement was observed at the 2-month follow-up3).
QWill the eye movement disorder recover?
A
In isolated 8.5 syndrome, the prognosis is good, and eye movements improve within a few months in most cases. However, abducens palsy tends to recover more slowly than adducens palsy.
The responsible lesion in 8.5 syndrome is the dorsal tegmentum of the caudal pons. In this area, the abducens nucleus, medial longitudinal fasciculus (MLF), and facial nerve fibers are in close proximity.
The structures and pathways involved in controlling horizontal gaze are as follows.
PPRF: The horizontal gaze center in the brainstem. Commands for saccadic eye movements are transmitted from the frontal eye field (Brodmann area 8) to the contralateral PPRF.
Abducens nucleus: Receives signals from the PPRF and directly innervates the ipsilateral lateral rectus muscle.
MLF pathway: Interneurons in the abducens nucleus project via the MLF to the contralateral oculomotor nucleus medial rectus subnucleus, causing contraction of the contralateral medial rectus muscle.
Through this circuit, when the PPRF on one side is excited, the ipsilateral lateral rectus and contralateral medial rectus contract, establishing conjugate gaze toward the same side.
The facial nerve nucleus is located in the dorsal pons. The fibers of the facial nerve run dorsomedially from the nucleus, loop around the abducens nucleus dorsally, then turn ventrally to exit the pons (facial nerve genu). Due to this course, lesions near the abducens nucleus often involve the facial nerve fibers.
Blood flow to the affected area originates from the paramedian pontine arteries (branches of the basilar artery), which supply one side of the midline. In elderly individuals, branch artery infarction due to arteriosclerosis is the main cause, while in younger individuals, demyelination due to multiple sclerosis is more common.
Muhammad H, Chan WS, Jaafar J, et al. Eight-and-a-Half Syndrome Secondary to Acute Brainstem Infarction. Cureus. 2024;16(7):e65138.
Ingle V, Panda S, Penuboina T, et al. Eight-and-a-half syndrome: a rare presentation. BMJ Case Rep. 2021;14:e244338.
Cárdenas-Rodríguez MA, Castillo-Torres SA, Chávez-Luévanos B, et al. Eight-and-a-half syndrome: video evidence and updated literature review. BMJ Case Rep. 2020;13:e234075.
Pilianidis G, Gogos G, Tontikidou C, et al. Eight and a half syndrome: a rare presentation of a brainstem infarction. Oxf Med Case Reports. 2022;2022:omac089.
Copy the article text and paste it into your preferred AI assistant.
Article copied to clipboard
Open an AI assistant below and paste the copied text into the chat box.